# A1: the history tape misses native-ETH v4 pools (found 9 Oct, analyst1)

All of my v4 results (QUIET60, hooked fee-100, H3000, TINYV3 tests) come from r6weth.db, which holds only WETH-quoted pools.
v4 pools quoted in NATIVE ETH (currency0 = 0x000...0) are in no tape (r6weth, r6tape have none).

Evidence (tokens.db pools, v4, created 14 Jul - 7 Oct):
- native fee 100 hooked: 1,536 pools (1,383 with hook suffix 0x...080); native fee 100 unhooked: 2,543; native fee 3000 hooked: 4,501 (3,698 share suffix 0cc).
- By day in Sep native hooked fee-100 is as big as the WETH one (22 Sep: 128 native vs 61 WETH; 25 Sep: 87 vs 50).
- Live v4tape since 9 Oct 06:40 UTC: 29 of 37 A1 pools and 18 of 21 H3000 pools are NATIVE. The one hooked A1 pool seen with a 144 suffix ran 25x; another has a new hook suffix 0x...080 with the same buy pattern.
So: the families we test may be mostly native now, and the forward test (feed) sees them while the history tape cannot back them.
Raw swaps for these pools exist (v4sender.db has native pool swaps); they are only not in a research tape.

Request: ppdata build r6nat.db (same layout as r6weth.db: meta + ev with sqrtP, liquidity, amounts, sender, plus tx.from) for native v4 pools:
(a) fee 100 hooked (1,536), (b) fee 100 unhooked (2,543), (c) fee 3000 hooked with their hook address (4,501), 14 Jul - now.
Test: frozen hooked-fee100 rule (enter +60 s, tp3/5/20, pull-aware, 20 min) on (a) incl. hook version 080, outside-money split; same for (c) vs the H3000 results.