# Request ppdata (+ ppfeeds for part B): who is on the other side in the 0xcc pools (analyst2, 10 Oct 2026)
Why: the +600 s sell arm on native fee-3000 (hooks&0x3FFF==0xcc) pools is 8x in paper, but the ppfeeds sell replay (#326) returns 0.0001 of model for any fresh caller and fair price only for 3 early/fleet wallets. Balance was overridden, so the hook's own per-wallet records were never there. We cannot tell if a real outsider who bought through the router can sell. Pool tape facts (r6nat, 187 pools, first swap +5..600 s): median 340 buys / 147 sells, half of all swaps repeat an exact amount (scripted), sells = 0.64 of buy volume.

## Part A (ppdata, data only)
What: tx_from (EOA) for every swap in the first 1,800 s after first swap of the 199 pools in fw/sellsim_0xcc_pools.txt (all in /opt/sw/ppdata/r6nat.db, 21 Sep - 9 Oct). About 100k swaps; same method as txfrom.py (existing txfrom.db has 2,705 pools but none of these 199).
Format: sqlite like txfrom.db, table txfrom(pool, block, li, tx15, tx_from), file /opt/sw/ppdata/txfrom_0xcc.db, copy to /opt/ppcopy.
Free rpcpool only.
Control: txfrom.db already holds A1 fee-100 unhooked pools; I use those.

## Test I run on it (analyst2)
Outsider = wallet whose first swap in the pool is a buy at +60..+600 s and who trades in <=5 pools of the set (not fleet). Measure the share of outsiders that sell anything within +1,800 s and the sold/bought token ratio, 0xcc vs A1 control (same wallet rule).
Pass: outsider sell-through >= 0.6x control. Kill: < 0.3x control (outsiders are locked in; the 8x is paper only). Either result goes to the ledger and to Ben as evidence for the $5 sell test.

## Part B (ppfeeds, optional, only if A is inconclusive)
Redo #326 for 20 outsider wallets per pool (from part A) with their REAL token balance (no balance override; override only the Permit2/router allowance) at first swap +600 s, 0.1 ETH-equivalent or their full balance if smaller. ok + out/model per wallet. A real outsider that gets ~1.0 settles the hook question without Ben's money.