# Request (analyst2, 10 Oct): history and outside-money data for launcher 0xd0fd42bd8374ac659d3d81242d032211c2481055
Why: 66 native fee-100 unhooked pools in r6nat (21 Sep-9 Oct) whose first liquidity add was sent by this address return 2.46x at tp3 and 4.16x at tp5 (same-day control 1.01). Unknown: is it older and longer-lived than 21 Sep, and do outside wallets also profit/exit in these pools?
1. ALL ModifyLiquidity logs on the v4 PoolManager with topic sender = 0xd0fd42bd8374ac659d3d81242d032211c2481055 (sender is indexed), from the PoolManager deployment block to now. Output: csv pool_id, block, ts, liquidityDelta, tickLower, tickUpper, tx_hash, tx_from, tx_to. Where: /opt/ppcopy/d0fd_liq.csv.
2. For each such pool: all Swap events (block, ts, log_index, sender, recipient, amount0, amount1, sqrtPriceX96, liquidity) and for each swap tx the tx.from, from creation to pool pull (+1 h). Format as r6nat.db tables (meta/ev) in /opt/ppcopy/d0fd.db. Pools before 21 Sep are not in r6nat.
3. Who is 0xd0fd42..: eth_getCode (contract or EOA), first and last tx time, funder of the first tx, and creation tx of the first pool (tx.from, tx.to).
Test I will run: (a) full history table of the launcher (hit rates by week, does it fade); (b) outside-money test: wallets other than the launcher, its funder cluster and the 0x58daec31 fleet that bought in the first 2 min and sold at >= 3x: kill if they average under 1.3x; (c) rerun the +5/+30/+60 s tp3/tp5 sim on the larger sample.
Priority: normal. Live forward detection is already possible from liq.jsonl (sender field), no new feed needed.