---
name: copytrade-targets
description: Wallets and named traders Ben screens for copy-trading — the win-spread method, the current shortlist, and the infrastructure addresses that keep faking a track record. Read alongside [[crypto-token-research]].
sources: [cowork]
aliases: [strong-traders, trader-screen, win-spread]
---
- Screening method that leads on named traders: plot a candidate's TOP FIVE realised trades on one shared dollar scale ("win spread"). One tall bar plus four stubs = lottery ticket; a descending staircase = process. Paired with the repeatability filter — must appear in the top holders of two or more independent runners. Dossier artifact: https://claude.ai/code/artifact/e0cae1a9-c7be-4a18-b1a9-21fb818c5a5d
- fomo.family is the best screening surface for NAMED traders: leaderboard with 24H/7D/30D/ALL tabs, and every profile exposes avg hold time, trade count, join date, top-5 trades with $ and %, the full open book and every swap with size and entry mcap. Token pages give per-holder avg entry mcap and avg hold. Read it in the browser while logged in; /leaderboard as a URL 404s, it is a sidebar tab

## Named-trader shortlist, 27 Aug 2026
- TIER 1 — DumbCrayonEater: NO X account at all so nobody front-runs him, 11d20h avg hold (longest on the board by ~3x), $2.34M book, three wins above +987% worth $1.6M/$844k/$253k, 1.5k trades since Nov 2025. His own line: "find good spots and hold for months"
- TIER 1 — PoorGoat @PoorGoat_: 481k followers, $3.08M book, two wins over $1.2M at +1,496% and +3,103%, runs visible size-in ladders (CATE across $32.9M-$74.5M). Caveat: 131 open positions and only 1d18h avg hold
- TIER 2 — change @change: #1 all-time +$2.84M, 2,000 trades since Jan 2026 = longest record on the platform, five six-figure wins but multiples only +30% to +211%. A grinder, not a rider — use as confirmation, not entry. Currently laddering STONKBROKER at $35M and MANCER at $3.6-5.5M
- TIER 2 — 0xAvast: 248k followers, $2.19M book, but 84% of top-5 is one CASHCAT entry at $55.3M, which was mid-run not early
- TIER 3 — Salem @Salem1299534: 94% of top-5 is one trade. Ranks #7 on a leaderboard that cannot tell that apart from #2

## Wallets — FULL AUDITED LEDGER 27 Aug 2026 supersedes the holder-screen numbers
Ledgers: Robinhood Chain https://claude.ai/code/artifact/215bd1dc-203e-42aa-b09e-e76515df3697 · Solana https://claude.ai/code/artifact/6111c30e-1cf5-4c2e-bf42-cb5b3aceed5b
Method that produced them: full eth_getLogs Transfer history (not Blockscout paging, which 503s and truncates), every counterparty classified with eth_getCode (contract = DEX trade, EOA = transfer with no cost basis), each leg priced at the token's GeckoTerminal hourly close at that block's timestamp, quantity-weighted entry and exit, then computed open balances reconciled against balanceOf. Only 11 of 1,247 legs were EOA transfers
- RANK 1 — 0x7e3Ba68C49561AaE7c23C1d20fEF0F1D7615a3ad: deployed $796,986, realised $1,470,842, open $1,423,391, NET +$2,097,246 (+263%), win rate 16/29 = 55%. Profit is SPREAD: PONS +$1.12M (9.47x realised, 11.71x open, only 12% sold), CASHCAT +$689k (7.38x across 147 sell legs), JUGGERNAUT +$117k (3.14x), HMM +$90.7k (16.39x realised), TENDIES +$57k (3.00x), SHR +$45k (36.27x), DELTA +$45.8k, STACK +$29.2k. Already running in strongtrader. Best of the four
- RANK 2 — 0xFF2bCd8E3a12d6930518A45519da1C5e67129948: deployed $753,685, realised $606,193, open $1,029,395, NET +$881,902 (+117%), win 12/25 = 48%. CASHCAT +$465,755 but weighted entry $0.0822 = only 2.83x open (37 buys, he bought the whole way up), PONS +$251,264 closed at 7.74x, AI +$199,381 (4.00x realised, 8.13x open). Worst loser FRONG -$45,400
- RANK 3 — 0xf974E1388Ed613000febDbfda6F42a830a24F1aA: deployed only $125,772, NET +$224,638 (+179%), win 4/7 = 57% (best win rate). CASHCAT +$170,918 at 5.80x open, DELTA +$29,706 at 3.11x, HOOKR +$11,621. Entries late but no churn
- RANK 4 — 0x194d98d18113bDD5720A0a89FE2F98C75ECe7344: NET +$1,256,829 but PONS alone is +$1,267,255, so EVERYTHING ELSE COMBINED IS -$10,426. Win rate 3/8 = 38%. It is a one-trade wallet
- CORRECTION, and the reason to re-audit before trusting any holder screen: 0x194d98d1 is NOT the 469x/21%-sold hold it looked like. Quantity-weighted PONS entry is $0.004732 (validated by hand against its 5.000 ETH buy on 14 Jul = $0.0043/token), so 25.89x open and 17.55x realised, not 469x — the 469x came from pricing the first leg only. And as of 27 Aug it has sold 45% of PONS, 3,000,000 tokens (~$368k) in six identical 500,000-token batches in 24 hours, ladder still running. Same first-leg defect inflated 0xFF2bCd8E's CASHCAT to "237x" when weighted it is 2.83x
- Solana wallets, ledgers COMPLETE (signatures paginated to exhaustion on two RPCs, ATAs derived and scanned separately to catch inbound-only transfers, SOL balances reproduced to the lamport — I re-verified all four independently): 9BMzTpSo… deployed $1.63M realised -$236k unrealised +$672k; F5hkYsi8… deployed $352k realised -$29k unrealised +$1.09M; ByQwybKU… deployed $200k realised -$41k unrealised +$40k; zV18RQem… deployed $121k realised -$14k unrealised +$175k. ALL FOUR ARE NET-NEGATIVE ON CLOSED TRADES — the money is entirely in a few open marks (CATE 7.14x, ANSEM 21.13x, STONK 7.16x)
- Solana mixed-basis trap: a wallet can hold far more of a token than it ever bought. F5hkYsi8 bought 2.64M STONK at $0.00645 but 16.29M more arrived by transfer — marking the whole balance against that entry shows ~$139k unrealised when only $13.7k sits on tokens actually paid for. Always split bought vs received before quoting a multiple

## Consistency screen, 27 Aug 2026 — the screen Ben actually wants
- [stated] Ben is not interested in wallets whose record is one lucky shot; he wants a pattern of competence, and does not require ten big winners
- Bar used: at least 3 positions each clearing +$10,000, no single name above 60% of net profit, and a trade in the last 48h. Pool = top 500 holders of twelve Robinhood Chain runners, 89 EOAs appeared in 3+, all 89 run through the full ledger. Ranking is count of $10k+ winners FIRST, then top-name concentration, then win rate — net dollars only break ties, because headline return is what makes a one-trade wallet look good
- FOUR clear the bar. #1 is 0x7e3Ba68C (8 winners, top name 56%, win 57%, +$2.0M) which was ALREADY in strongtrader — so the wide screen confirmed the existing pick rather than beating it
- NEW #2 — 0x56E95b47a07210F1eA9fa418C7c5Dc164c419Ac0: six winners and every one a multiple, FOUR of them fully closed at 2.45x / 3.54x / 4.39x / 5.74x. CASHCAT bought 4 Jul 14:59-15:00 in three ~1M clips direct from pool 0xA70fc67C at $0.00715 (eleven times cheaper than 0xFF2bCd8E's $0.0822 on the same token), realised 6.86x on 86% sold, 32.58x on the rest. PONS +$259k, HMM +$56k at 14.80x, MARIAN +$43k, DIH +$21.7k, REPE +$11.4k. Net +$892,735 on $398,128 (+224%), win 7/17, 17 blocks/day, 2 inbound transfers. Banking a multiple four separate times is the hardest evidence of skill in the set
- NEW #3 — 0x4d9aA6d0577b26d9803a4d1EC2b4eBEbe41291cA: three winners each partly banked and partly left running (PONS 1.67x realised / 5.04x open, HMM 6.93x realised / 24.38x open, DELTA 1.36x / 5.17x). Net +$171,380 on only $71,952 (+238%), win 4/8, 7 blocks/day, ZERO wallet-to-wallet transfers
- NEW #4 — 0x235Bb77825425838351d80bA4CD791d1fA4949cC: five of seven green and has sold NONE of them (JUGGERNAUT 3.47x, CASHCAT 4.08x, AI 5.49x all 0% sold). 3 blocks/day over 45 days, zero transfers ever. Excellent entries but only $4,734 realised in its life — exits completely unproven, so do not size on it yet
- REJECTED as a bot: 0x311aaC4d6a2Ca079169c6dA99Aba5F853c6ECAA0 showed 4 winners and the best concentration in the pool (37%) but runs 84 blocks/day across 815 tokens, and its CASHCAT position is 1,309 legs across 1,305 separate blocks averaging $4.59 each — one dust buy per block. Farming/arb script, not a trader. Also rejected: two wallets deploying seven figures with ~4% priceable coverage (exchange behaviour) and one dormant 14 days
- Coverage caveat that caps all of it: these wallets touch 500-800 token contracts each, nearly all the chain's stock-dust airdrop. Only 39% of 0x7e3Ba68C's legs and 25% of 0x56E95b47's could be priced. Net figures are a floor, not a full account
- Pricing artefact to watch: where a token's OHLCV series starts AFTER a wallet's first buy, that buy drops out of the cost basis and "sold %" can exceed 100. Screen for sold%>105 and discard those rows. It hit 0x7e3Ba68C's HOODRAT and most of 0x5DEd45bb (which is why that wallet was excluded despite an 80% win rate)

## Traps
- Solana sell percentages are lower bounds only: public RPCs truncate getSignaturesForAddress unpredictably (same wallet returned 54 days on one call and 1.85 days on the next)
- ASTyfSima4LLAdDgoFGkgqoKowG1LZFDr9fAQrg7iaJZ qualified in SIX independent Solana tokens and is a market maker — 6,193 token accounts, 6,411 tx/day, bought 587,007 and sold 664,246 of ANSEM in two days. Loudest signal in the study, entirely fake
- 0x2dBAf98620aC5Bbe3441f756fEfF82702D095b1a: $6.46M, top-50 holder in six of eight Robinhood Chain anchors, zero DEX buys ever. Exchange hot wallet
- kolscan's published KOL wallets (MoneyMike, Peenuts, Kev, Limfork.eth, EustazZ) are all live but the wrong archetype — Kev and Limfork carry ~3,500 token accounts at 500+ tx/day — and across 20 Solana panel runners exactly one appears in any top-50, at rank #48 in dust. Published KOL wallets did not catch the runners
- Blockscout gotcha that decides whether a holder screen works at all: /tokens/{CA}/holders paginates via next_page_params but returns EMPTY if you pass ?limit=. At top-50 the Robinhood Chain cross-token intersection was 100% infrastructure; at top-500 it produced real traders. Always go 500 deep

## DineroDom @DineroDom0 (1/3 of @MCGlive) — wallet hunt 29 Aug 2026, NO WALLET FOUND
- [stated] Ben asked to identify DineroDom's wallets with high confidence, digging through the coins he calls and who buys them
- He HAS a fomo.family account — fomo.family/profile/DineroDom0, joined Oct 2025 — but it is EMPTY: 0 trades, $0, no positions, no hold time. fomo is not where he trades. Co-host @ChillTRD has one with 67 trades but $100-200 clips and $12.61 lifetime PnL; @mynt_josh exists too. All three MCG hosts are dead ends on fomo
- MCG Live is three people: @mynt_josh (founder), @ChillTRD, @DineroDom0. No wallet, ENS, donation address or website disclosed by any of them anywhere. No Farcaster (fnames empty), no Basename, no Lens
- dinerodom.eth resolves to 0x7656354162ac373A52783896E0DC9D1A1352d94d, registered Nov 2021 with the reverse record set — but ZERO text records, so no link to the X account. On Robinhood Chain it has 2 txs ever and holds 1 DIH. It bridged 1.7 ETH on 12-13 Jul 2026 to DBK Chain (0x28f1b9F457CB51E0af56dff1d11CD6CEdFfD1977), not to RH chain. Low confidence it is him, near-zero that it is his trading wallet
- His self-disclosed book, 21 Aug: CASHCAT, PONS, DELTA, HOOKR, AI (Artificial Inu) on RH chain + STONK on Solana (6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx, StonkFun). Also "I bought" NOXA 13 Jul, the FRONG->PONS barbell 5-6 Aug, INDEX, BOW, MET, and "top holder in $CPT" (ICM.run, Solana) Nov 2025
- Top-2,500 EOA holder pull on 11 RH tokens. The net catches anyone holding more than $2.60 HOOKR / $38 DELTA / $485 AI / $302 STONKBROKER / $406 INDEX / $3,016 CASHCAT / $3,786 PONS. Exactly FIVE EOAs hold all five of his RH names and every one is infrastructure: 0x2dbaf986 (exchange hot wallet), 0x4123ffc8 (1,846 tokens, 61k transfers, farmer), 0xa4d9d706 (1 tx, receives router fee payouts every minute), 0x2858517d and 0xce38c120 (first tx 10 and 24 Aug, too late)
- [stated] Ben rejected the custodial conclusion: "he doesn't trade in the Robinhood app, he trades on-chain like everybody else. Find wallets that fit what he's holding and what he's talking about at those specific times — he was a very early buyer of DELTA." He was right to push back and the second pass corrected two real errors

## SECOND PASS 29 Aug 2026 — method corrected, candidates narrowed (still not confirmed)
- ERROR 1: current balances are the wrong instrument for someone who rotates. Redone from eth_getLogs Transfer history with NET accumulation per address inside a window that ENDS at his first public post on that token
- ERROR 2: the HOOKR shakeout window was wrong. MCG's "800K to 418K post-interview" is 13-19 AUG (low 240-450K, ran to 4.3M on 24 Aug and 8M on 26 Aug), NOT the 9-11 Aug dip I first screened. Redoing it changed the entire candidate set
- His timeline, first public cashtag per name: CASHCAT 11 Jul 03:49 · NOXA 13 Jul 22:36 ("I bought") · PONS + FRONG 6 Aug 20:02 · DELTA 14 Aug 03:05 ("Meteora of robinhood at $600k") cashtag 15 Aug · HOOKR 19 Aug 21:38 · STONK 20 Aug · AI 21 Aug 02:25. Corpus = 497 posts Aug 2025 - Aug 2026 via LunarCrush
- DELTA is the sharpest anchor: launched 31 Jul 22:00 at $7k mcap, under $120k until 6 Aug 20:00, now ~$16.8M. 409 addresses accumulated it under $120k; 2,052 before his 14 Aug post; only 67 of those still hold 60%+ of what they bought
- SHORTLIST, best fits, none confirmed: 0xaa093a5d3f3a57deaff97ce0ce7af4c08b39f9f8 ($478k — AI bought 9 Jul, DELTA 7.98M bought 2 Aug at ~$84k mcap, NEVER SOLD EITHER, 552 txs, 150 tokens) · 0x3051a932270b95800b273e59f2525d6bf442ad82 ($387k DELTA+PONS+BOW, never sold) · 0xf55c688510f75bf279315e496d430efa62eb1cf6 (only wallet that ticks DELTApre + HOOKR shakeout at $452k avg entry + AIpre + CASHCATpre and still holds all three, but tiny $10.5k book bought in 5-30k clips = probably a DCA bot) · 0xc3150c77428542bb64a7a2199c33b1bdbf56b386 (bought NOXA on 13 Jul, the exact day he wrote "I bought"; holds 6 of his names; $21k) · 0x736274051aed34ddd62ade04417bca12a06148af (21M DELTA = $354k bought 2 Aug, never sold, 27 tokens, but DELTA-only)
- ELIMINATION TOOL THAT WORKS: fomo token pages list holders BY NAME with exact balance and avg entry mcap. Match the balance to Blockscout and you name the wallet. 0xc2e2255b (5,000,000 DELTA, entry ~$746k) = @kch3n. fomo only lists wallets it has identity for (3,146 of DELTA's 9,196 holders), so absence proves nothing about size — but it removes known traders from the pool
- Still unresolved and still the two things that would close it: Arkham site permission on the Mac, and a Solana holder snapshot of $CPT for 7-11 Nov 2025 (he wrote "I have built a position as a top holder in $CPT" at ~$1M mcap — that names his Solana wallet outright, needs a Helius/Vybe/Dune key)
- THE ACTUAL EDGE FOUND INSTEAD — MCG's own published pattern, 26 Aug: dev hints at an MCG appearance, chart runs 140K->300K; MCG confirms, runs to 2M; interview airs, instant sell-off; buy that shakeout. HOOKR dipped 800K->418K post-interview then ran to 4.3M; BOW followed the identical script to $2.4M. Trade the MCG booking calendar, not the man
- Blocked and worth unblocking: intel.arkm.com needs Chrome-extension site permission on Ben's Mac — Arkham is the one purpose-built X-handle-to-wallet index and it was the only source I could not reach
- Gotcha for any future run: LunarCrush rewrites cashtags in post text as CAIP ids like "ethereum:0x44ff8620..." and "cash-cat:native" — those are TOKEN contracts, never wallet disclosures
- Robinhood Chain ERC-20 Transfer topic0 is 0xddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef; Blockscout 403s without a browser User-Agent; RH chain runs ~10 blocks/sec

## rb3k @rbthreek (24.5k followers) wallet hunt, 29 Aug 2026
- [stated] Ben asked to find @rbthreek's wallet from his posts, Robinhood Chain activity specifically
- IDENTITY WALLETS, CONFIRMED (his X handle is written into the on-chain record and the basename description "sailboat" is his exact X bio): rbthreek.eth AND rbthreek.base.eth both resolve to 0x3AfEFFB411BeBB8852f542123aB2C6ce5CC95968, a CoinbaseSmartWallet. Empty everywhere (0.00027 ETH on Base; deployed on RH chain with 1 tx and ZERO token transfers). Its owner slots: a WebAuthn passkey, EOA 0xc75751c5F10025aFAFf55B9bC6FDf84199236775 (EIP-7702 delegated, 12 txs, dust subscription payments), and 0xf85210B21cc50302F477BA56686d2019dc9b67AD (shared Coinbase module, 10k txs, not personal). Base App profile EOA 0x05428fEa8E81e7b6F4Fb1E7A7A5fB81E1a1d7F09 (53 txs, dust). Farcaster fid 201185 (rb3k), custody 0x52e13b6cd1070670e8a98037f81f92cb3299d969. NONE of these trades
- NOT on fomo.family: the app's own request to /v2/users/userHandle/rbthreek returns 404 and in-app trader search for "rb3k" and "rbthreek" returns nothing. web3.bio lists "fomo" as a source but it maps to the identity wallet, not an account. He USES fomo to check other people's holdings ("Check his fomo holdings")
- He has never posted an address: X search from:rbthreek 0x returns zero. He is wallet-privacy aware, 15 Aug: "trade for 30 days on an anon wallet and dox the wallet for results"
- HIS SELF-DECLARED RH BOOK, 22 Aug reply to @isitnuel: "Pons, Stonkbroker, netnet, delta, artificial inu, tendies, cashcat". Also 14 Aug "Couple microcaps I like on the green chain: $NET $DELTA", 17 Aug "I was late to both Pons and SB and they were 2/3 of my best trades on RH", 23 Aug "one of my biggest pnl holds is on HyperEVM", 26 Aug "have a position on $aero still", 28 Aug "$gSPEED" plus he received the gVITALIK airdrop. Also an @Altcoinist affiliate (referral link t.me/altcoinist_trenchbot) and runs @SailboatFi (protected account) which ran a @DefinitiveFi trading competition he paid out 18 Aug
- METHOD THAT WORKED: full eth_getLogs Transfer reconstruction of the two rarest names (NET 387,103 logs, DELTA 284,747) gives exact holder sets (4,968 and 8,532), 599 hold both, then balanceOf on the other five. 68 EOAs hold ALL SEVEN. Top-500 Blockscout holder pages are useless here (intersection of all seven at top-500 is one Uniswap v4 PoolManager)
- BEST CANDIDATE 0x2cffed5d56eb6a17662756ca0fdf350e732c9818: passes every test. All 7 RH names; NET first in 8 Aug and DELTA 10 Aug, both BEFORE his 14 Aug call; widest RH winner book (USDG $39.5k, PONS $6.2k, GOOD $5.4k, NET $3.8k, CASHCAT $2.8k, STONKBROKER $2.5k, HMM, INDEX, HOOKR, JUGGERNAUT, PRISM, HOODRAT, BOW); on Base holds every name he has mentioned and in size (ALTT 28,814, AERO 5,902, gSPEED 12.15, gELON 14.63, gVITALIK 1.10, the largest gVITALIK airdrop in the candidate set); 379.86 HYPE on HyperEVM; never sends. Caveat that stops it being certain: it also holds 481.6 ETH on Base and 651.9 ETH on mainnet at nonce 6 and 9, so either he is far richer than he presents or it is a custody address
- RUNNERS UP: 0x8fe83dab1d17185f091569b440b9e3c7ead1453d (only other wallet holding all five Base names AND passing the NET/DELTA date test, but small at a $2.0k RH basket); 0x0e331a293bb22e93e2e5e417d84d755ae185da02 (best behavioural fit: Base nonce 13,748, ETH 7,604, Arb 1,528, HyperEVM 354 txs and 225 HYPE, dates pass, but no gSPEED and no gVITALIK); 0x147cf09e7373b8fda6f12021f1b0f98d6da1a566 (largest gSPEED at 2.15, holds TTWO which he posted about 28 Aug, dates pass, but no ALTT)
- STRUCTURAL FINDING THAT CHANGES ALL RH-CHAIN WALLET WORK: retail buys on Robinhood Chain execute through ERC-4337. 0x2cffed5d's first DELTA buy arrived via EntryPoint v0.7 0x0000000071727De22E5E9d8BAf0edAc6f37da032, others via relayer contracts. A real trader's address routinely shows nonce 0 and has never sent a transaction. Nonce is NOT a bot or infrastructure filter on this chain, and funder-tracing to a first-funding EOA does not work
- THE TEST THAT WOULD SETTLE IT: 28 Aug he posted "Might have found another gem on rh will share tomorrow if it doesn't rug by then". He buys before he posts. Pull every buyer of that token in the hours before the reveal and intersect with the 68
- Robinhood Chain real contracts verified this run (rank by VOLUME not liquidity, impersonators everywhere): PONS 0x39dBED3a2bd333467115dE45665cC57F813C4571, STONKBROKER 0xe934e36A439C94017B64a3FecE66AF12099aBF50, NET 0xCA9c78Dd337A67F6e0077F65F5E9218719d30eDf (9 decimals, not 18), DELTA 0xe8ffd7e24187F72afB08d75B1bb13088A989a791, TENDIES 0x45242320DBB855EeA8Fd36804C6487E10E97FCF9, CASHCAT 0x020bfC650A365f8BB26819deAAbF3E21291018b4, AI 0x2E8c31162b855A2ffa90F6F8634643Ad6F111e18, TTWO 0x5e81213613b6B86EaB4c6c50d718d34359459786. Base: ALTT 0x1B5cE2a593a840E3ad3549a34D7b3dEc697c114D, gSPEED 0xA0dD634A9D3C91829081Fc66B90103A3E5c6aeeC, gVITALIK 0x07cf5042EaFaDBB52Ba003253509b8159B11fD80
- Full-range eth_getLogs on the RH RPC times out. Chunk at 200k blocks with 10 threads and a 25k-block fallback, which completes a full token history in about two minutes

## DineroDom THIRD PASS 29 Aug 2026 — Helius, Solana, and the MCG booking calendar
- [stated] Ben supplied two Helius keys. The first (81d09860-1465-4ede-926b-1d6ab133dc0f) 401s from both the container and his Mac — dead or IP-locked. The second (4c494046-6535-491e-9b48-9bbf9199bfaf) works: DAS getTokenAccounts for full holder lists, v0 enhanced transactions, getMultipleAccounts
- MUST APPLY THE ERC-4337 FINDING FROM THE rbthreek WORK ABOVE: I wrongly rejected five DineroDom candidates for having 0-4 transactions against tens of thousands of token transfers (0xa4d9d7068d, 0x2cffed5d, 0x0e331a29, 0xd0a67cb0, 0x73691cee). On Robinhood Chain that is a normal retail smart-account user, not a receive-only address. Those five go back into the pool. Note 0x2cffed5d is the rbthreek session's best candidate, so it is probably HIS, not Dom's — a useful cross-investigation elimination
- $CPT is Empulser Enterprises, mint 9XWWHExgN4yvyLRskzzfcr5AcBaqQ6UtwcDSVpUBsoar, launched 6 Nov 2025, only 821 holders. Replayed 42k transfer legs to rebuild the holder table as of 4 Dec 2025
- SOLANA TRAP: intersecting holders across many small Solana tokens converges on METEORA DAMM LP OPERATORS, not traders. Top hit HLnpSz9h2S4hiLQ43rnSD9XkcUThA7B8hQMKmDaiTLcC held CPT+AVICI+KLED+DUPE+VIVA (his exact stated bag list) and was #1 CPT holder at 26.66% — but its token-account history is CREATE_POOL / ADD_LIQUIDITY / CLAIM_POSITION_FEE on METEORA_DAMM_V2. Also 4,000 of its last 4,000 transactions were ones it did NOT sign — Solana tx counts are meaningless without a feePayer filter
- 0xf70da97812CB96acDF810712Aa562db8dfA3dbEF is the Robinhood-side hot wallet (5.1M txs on Ethereum, 929k on RH chain, funds hundreds of fresh RH wallets an hour). It funded four of five EVM candidates, so it is not a personal link. dinerodom.eth did send it 0.56 ETH across four txs in Nov 2024, i.e. that wallet's owner deposited to Robinhood
- CROSS-CHAIN DISCRIMINATOR: EVM addresses are identical across chains. Six of ten DineroDom candidates have ZERO history on Ethereum/Base/Arbitrum/Optimism (0xaa093a5d, 0x3051a932, 0x736274051, 0xc2e2255b, 0xb0144f2b, 0x32c4b2cf) — hard to square with a man who posts about UNI, Derive, Base and Hyperliquid. Multichain ones: 0x22bf3682 (587 ETH / 926 Base / 354 Arb, 9.59 ETH on Base), 0xd5b4d9c3 (315 ETH / 1,215 Base), 0xc3150c77 (1,157 ETH / 269 Base)
- THE MCG BOOKING CALENDAR — best dataset in the hunt. @MCGlive posts "Tomorrow on MCG $X" ~12-24h ahead and "This Week on MCG" days ahead; 81 tokens carry a dated announcement, extracted to /tmp/dd/mcg_eps.json. MCGAlpha's bio says @DineroDom0 does the BOOKING, so he knows the lineup before anyone. The screen: net accumulation per address from token launch to MCG's first public announcement, intersected across booked tokens. RH-chain episode dates — DELTA 12 Aug, NET 14 Aug, MOTION 18 Aug, HOOKR/CLAW/AEON 19 Aug, MET/MADE 20 Aug, BOW/UP/INJOH/WALL3/WTH announced 23 Aug, QUOTIENT 26 Aug, SCOPL/EARN 27 Aug, DTF 28 Aug, PONS/AI 20 Jul, KARMA/VEX/RAXOL 17 Jul, WOOD 15 Jul, SQUEEZE 24 Jul, SZR/URU 2 Aug
- DELTA's sequence proves the mechanism: launched 31 Jul at $7k, under $120k until 6 Aug 20:00, then $73k -> $1.15M in six hours on 6-7 Aug — FIVE DAYS BEFORE its 12 Aug MCG episode. The 409 addresses that bought DELTA under $120k are the pre-signal set
- THE MCG PRE-ANNOUNCEMENT SCREEN, RUN AND CONTROLLED: pulled full Transfer logs for seven MCG-booked RH tokens and computed net accumulation before each token's first forward-looking MCG post (DTF 28 Aug, WALL3 + BOW 23 Aug, SCOPL 27 Aug, SZR + URU 2 Aug, RAXOL 17 Jul). Twelve wallets were early on five of them — and the control killed it: six are contracts and the EOAs hold 1,005 to 19,736 different RH tokens with 22k-789k transfers. They are launch snipers who buy every new token, so they precede every announcement by construction. A pre-announcement screen on this chain MUST carry a selectivity filter or it returns only snipers
- After filtering to EOAs holding under 800 RH tokens, 33 wallets remain early on 3+ booked tokens. The one that also carries his book is 0x0e331a293bb22e93e2e5e417d84d755ae185da02 — early on WALL3/SCOPL/BOW pre-announcement, holds DELTA+HOOKR+AI+NOXA+FRONG+BOW, 33.83 ETH on RH chain, and a genuine multichain footprint (7,608 Ethereum txs, 13,391 Base, 1,467 Arbitrum). Its weakness is size: 41,499 DELTA and 82,439 HOOKR are only a few hundred dollars each
- CAUTION on all of it: the parallel rbthreek investigation in this same file converged on an overlapping candidate set (0x2cffed5d, 0x0e331a29, 0x147cf09e, 0x8fe83dab). Two independent hunts landing on the same wallets means these are the chain's generic early-buyer cohort, not identity-resolved. Do not attribute any of them to a named person without a self-disclosure or a second dated, priced trade to intersect
- VERDICT after three passes: DineroDom's wallet is still not identified. Nothing on Robinhood Chain, Solana or Ethereum carries his book with his timing at a size consistent with the show. The remaining moves are Arkham (needs the Chrome site permission on his Mac), a CPT holder snapshot for 7-11 Nov 2025 pushed further back than the 42k legs already replayed, and catching the next live "Dom bought X at Y" from @MCGlive to intersect against the HOOKR window

## DineroDom FOURTH PASS 30 Aug 2026 — LEADING CANDIDATE FOUND: 0x5d8e32fc29ddb1341e0563b4dc7de7587f4067ee
- THE POST THAT CRACKED IT, 22 Aug 14:43: "Adding $DELTA, $HOOKR, and $STONK after the liquidity suck Friday and flush today should age extremely well." Three named tokens, one dated buy. Friday was 21 Aug
- Method: pulled DELTA, HOOKR and AI Transfer logs for blocks 41,619,010-43,556,951 (20 Aug 18:00 - 23 Aug 00:00) and computed net accumulation for 21-22 Aug. 764 bought DELTA, 558 bought HOOKR, 89 bought BOTH, 10 also bought AI, only 3 did it in one clustered session, and only ONE still holds all three
- 0x5d8e32fc bought DELTA 1,401,020 at 12:22, HOOKR 2,842,999 at 12:25 and AI 230,521 at 12:30 on 21 Aug — an EIGHT MINUTE session — and has sold none of it. He posted "I already know I'd have soooo much Cope and fomo right now if I wasn't positioned so well" at 14:08, his six-name portfolio list at 15:12, and "Exponential growth on my $DELTA" at 15:51 — all the same afternoon. Later: "GM to anyone with the $HOOKR $DELTA barbell" 24 Aug, "Vertical accumulation on my $HOOKR" 25 Aug
- IT ALSO FRONT-RUNS THE MCG CALENDAR: bought RAXOL and VEX on 11 Jul 12:31-13:03, 5.6 days before MCG's 17 Jul announcement, and sold VEX on 19 Jul two days after the episode. Bought PONS 15 Jul 12:16, 4.5 days before the 20 Jul week-ahead post
- Shape: EOA, 25 transactions, 178 token transfers, 135 RH tokens — genuinely selective, nothing like the 20k-800k-transfer snipers. 1.25 ETH on RH chain. Mainnet EOA since 17 Jun 2023 with 402 txs and 2.05 ETH; bridges in via Across (depositV3 on an ERC1967Proxy SpokePool, not the Robinhood hot wallet). Basket ~$66k, near equal-weighted across the three names
- Unnamed on fomo: its 2,842,999 HOOKR at a ~$1.5M average entry matches no named holder on fomo's HOOKR page (the 2.8M entries there are Tsukikage/TokenFable/qwerky8888 at $7.4-9.1M entries). Consistent with a man whose fomo account has zero trades
- AGAINST, and why this is ~60-65% not confirmed: its Ethereum mainnet identity is a Pendle / Ethena / Usual / stSYRUP yield farmer, which does not match his public content at all; it SOLD all its PONS on 4 Aug, two days before he publicly called the FRONG->PONS rotation, and never rebought, yet he lists PONS in his book; it holds no CASHCAT and no STONKBROKER; and on 29-30 Aug it made ~16 repeated large COPPERINU and "fone" buys that look like volume farming
- Runners-up from the same 21-22 Aug cluster: 0xdecba5d411253f488b49bfc0d581afe6428a0d2a (DELTA+HOOKR+AI but 20h apart, holds CASHCAT/DELTA/HOOKR/AI/FRONG/INDEX, 318M 0xZAPS, no other-chain history) and 0x133b5a28010c9830b268a07465a31ba0d75ccb55 (9-minute cluster but sold everything)
- REUSABLE: the sharpest screen for any KOL is a post naming 2+ tokens bought on a stated date. Pull each token's logs for that window, intersect the net accumulators, then rank by how tightly clustered the buys are in time. 764 x 558 collapsed to one wallet in four steps

## DineroDom 0xZAPS check, 30 Aug 2026, and a correction Ben should not carry forward
- [stated] Ben names 0x5d8e32fc29ddb1341e0563b4dc7de7587f4067ee the "highest odds wallet"
- CORRECTION 1: that wallet holds ZERO 0xZAPS and has never touched the token. The 0xZAPS position belongs to the RUNNER-UP, 0xdecba5d411253f488b49bfc0d581afe6428a0d2a
- CORRECTION 2: "no history on other chains" also belongs to the runner-up, not the highest odds wallet. 0x5d8e32fc29ddb1341e0563b4dc7de7587f4067ee has 402 Ethereum mainnet transactions, a mainnet EOA since 17 Jun 2023, 2.05 ETH, and it funds itself by bridging in through Across (depositV3 on an ERC1967Proxy SpokePool), not from the Robinhood hot wallet
- 0xZAPS contract is 0xDd90bFa4adC7F4401E611AbaC692D939F9F4CB07 (OpenZaps), 904 holders, 100bn supply, first chain activity 10 Aug 2026 00:25. His public breakdown of the HOOKR to 0xZAPS correlation aired via @MCGlive on 26 Aug 14:00
- 0xdecba5d411253f488b49bfc0d581afe6428a0d2a bought 318,218,890 0xZAPS in ONE clip on 24 Aug 13:29, two days before the public breakdown, and has sold none of it
- 0xd5b4d9c363de023dd9f656e3b2f38ff5e4d5ccdc bought 1,005,937,954 on 17 Aug 19:46 and 477,619,683 on 18 Aug 20:52, eight to nine days early, then distributed from 21 Aug and sold 34,434,622 on 26 Aug 18:11, four hours AFTER the breakdown. Classic accumulate early, distribute into your own narrative
- 0xf55c688510f75bf279315e496d430efa62eb1cf6 bought 44,010,871 0xZAPS on 19 Aug then sold into 24 and 25 Aug
- THE RUNNER-UP GETS UPGRADED TO CO-PRIMARY on this. Its 21 to 22 Aug buys fit his wording better than the highest odds wallet: DELTA 21 Aug 17:12 and HOOKR 21 Aug 17:14 (two minutes apart, Friday), then AI 22 Aug 13:11 and more HOOKR 22 Aug 15:27 (Saturday). He wrote "Adding $DELTA, $HOOKR, and $STONK after the liquidity suck Friday and flush today", which is BOTH days. 0x5d8e32fc29ddb1341e0563b4dc7de7587f4067ee only bought on the Friday
- Book comparison in his named tokens: 0xdecba5d411253f488b49bfc0d581afe6428a0d2a holds $159,826 across CASHCAT $43,992, AI $79,426, FRONG $16,751, HOOKR $8,587, DELTA $7,005, INDEX $4,065 (six names). 0x5d8e32fc29ddb1341e0563b4dc7de7587f4067ee holds $66,303 across HOOKR $20,424, DELTA $22,781, AI $23,098 (three names, near equal weight, none sold)
- Against the runner-up: no Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum or Optimism history at all; 12,015 token transfers across 262 tokens versus the highest odds wallet's 161 across 135, so it is noisier; and it trimmed roughly 26% of its HOOKR
- 0x133b5a28010c9830b268a07465a31ba0d75ccb55 is OUT by Ben's instruction and by the evidence: it made the nine minute cluster but sold everything and holds none of it
- RUN BOTH. 0x5d8e32fc29ddb1341e0563b4dc7de7587f4067ee = highest odds. 0xdecba5d411253f488b49bfc0d581afe6428a0d2a = co-primary, and the one carrying the 0xZAPS tell
- CONTINUED IN [[dinerodom-wallets]] from 30 Aug 2026 — the MOO timing test and the tracking bot live there because this file hit its size cap

## Ben's stated copy-trade criterion, 1 Sep 2026
- [stated] He does NOT want wallets that flip at +20% or +30%. He wants wallets that get in EARLY and hold for at least a 3x, and he wants the different styles named and separated rather than one ranked list
- [stated] Source of his candidate lists: Birdeye.so, Robinhood filter, "profitable traders" tab. He pastes the addresses raw in chat
- Screened eight Birdeye-sourced wallets on 1 Sep 2026. Two clear the bar and are the ones to follow: 0xF86a7c853B60C36f79F6E1dE0E7868d109E97004 (ten $10k+ winners, nine exits above 3x, median entry ~$550k mcap, sells partial and lets the rest run) and 0x89C2F9c465372852D9724F4688d8C7D000Db2c39 (four $10k+ winners, DTF from a $230k entry, noisier with a long 1.1x-1.5x tail). Both to be added to strongtrader.service on kookwatch