---
name: dfarmer-wallets
description: The DFarmer (@OGDfarmer, 127.9k followers) Robinhood Chain wallet hunt — his dated book, the screens run, the surviving candidates and exactly why each fails. Read with [[copytrade-targets]] and [[dinerodom-wallets]].
sources: [cowork]
aliases: [ogdfarmer, dfarmer]
---
- [stated] Ben asked to find @OGDfarmer's wallets on Robinhood Chain only, going deep on his posting history
- STATUS 30 Aug 2026: NOT IDENTIFIED. No wallet on the chain carries his stated book at his stated weighting. Best candidates listed below, each with a specific disqualifying gap

## His dated RH book, all UTC, from 494 posts via LunarCrush (28 May to 24 Aug 2026)
- 17 Jul 00:43 "$INDEX is the chosen one, and it's my biggest RH bag"
- 19 Jul 01:02 praises $TENDIES as the best distributed meme of the year
- 21 Jul 01:37 "Confirming my initial buys and gut instinct, PONS and WIRE have solidified as my two biggest and most convicted infra plays on RH chain"
- 21 Jul 21:01 "Got my first RH chain NFT today" — UNUSED AND THE SHARPEST UNTRIED LEVER, RH chain NFT mints are rare
- 23 Jul 01:49 his long $AI (Artificial Inu) thread
- 6 Aug 01:13 "I bought more hmm cat ... and tendies" — his only two-token dated buy claim
- 8 Aug 15:51 "In the process of $PRISM-pilling myself"
- 23 Aug 20:44 "I hold a fuckton of both" ($AI and $INDEX)
- He has NEVER posted an address: zero 0x wallet strings and zero .eth names in the whole corpus

## Contracts used for the screen
- INDEX 0x56910D4409F3a0C78C64DD8D0545FF0705389870 (pool 3 Jul 02:55)
- PONS 0x39dBED3a2bd333467115dE45665cC57F813C4571
- WIRE 0x8ECEA3d0E648DB646d824AA51EedeB16aC3d6878 (wire bot, pool 17 Jul 19:04, the rarest name and the best bottleneck)
- AI 0x2E8c31162b855A2ffa90F6F8634643Ad6F111e18
- PRISM 0x20024E485c0B22b42855589700721b28320A7777 (Prism Assets, pool 4 Aug 02:49; his 19 Jun "$Prism holder at $700" predates it so that was another chain)
- HMM 0x7FE995a80075dF3Dc8Ae11A9b82c7FE4202CD87f (Thinking Cat)
- TENDIES 0x45242320DBB855EeA8Fd36804C6487E10E97FCF9

## His clock
- Dead 04:00-09:59 UTC: 9 of 494 posts, 1.8%. Peak 20:00-01:00 and 14:00-16:00 UTC. That sleep window is 00:00-06:00 US Eastern, so he is a US East Coast night owl

## Screens run and what each returned
- HMM + TENDIES net accumulators before 6 Aug 01:13: 36 addresses, 20 EOAs. NONE carries his book. His wallet did not add HMM or TENDIES in that window under any address that also holds INDEX
- WIRE accumulators 17-21 Jul (1,721) intersected with INDEX accumulators 3-17 Jul (6,987): 263 addresses, 162 EOAs. Priced their books: not one has INDEX as its largest position alongside a real AI position
- All 315 holders of more than $800 of WIRE checked against all seven names. Produced the candidate list below
- METHOD BUG WORTH REMEMBERING: requiring the token to arrive FROM a pool address works on direct v4 PoolManager fills but DROPS buyers on this chain whose fill routes pool to router to user. It returned 19 addresses of which 16 were routers. Use plain NET ACCUMULATION and then remove infrastructure by behaviour, not a from-pool filter
- Code length 48 on this chain means an EIP-7702 delegated EOA, a normal smart-wallet user, NOT a contract. Do not filter those out

## Candidates and the exact reason each fails
- 0xd5158F203e0170b1420d0a1B813E0B08b4d2E37b — the only address holding all six names: INDEX $10,111, PONS $13,432, WIRE $1,803, AI $2,174, HMM $17,826, TENDIES $1,710. 321 txs, 8,838 token transfers, active since 18 Jul. FAILS: HMM is its largest, not INDEX; it bought no HMM or TENDIES on 5-6 Aug; 16% of its txs fall in his sleep window
- 0x824aD98FBCb4220F49ED80051815F649aCe4B465 — best match for "INDEX is my biggest RH bag": INDEX $130,831 dominant, PONS $19,169, WIRE $2,565, 491 txs. FAILS: zero AI, zero PRISM, zero HMM, zero TENDIES
- 0x8C1fC660fc56bEB49A657276C7692Cc6ad98349e — INDEX $48,457, PONS $66,532, WIRE $17,215, only 41 txs, best clock at 12%. FAILS: no AI, PRISM, HMM or TENDIES, and it is dead 12:00-20:00 UTC which is one of his active stretches
- 0x909e036A15AfE4210F9cA947a099318d56595292 — INDEX $42,220, PONS $45,622, PRISM $2,592, WIRE $1,411. FAILS: no activity before 24 Aug
- 0xE61B559DBaF93F606dFEA6d7A3e94C7f2D4283Ef — five names worth $43k. FAILS the clock hard: 46% of its txs land in his sleep window
- RULED OUT as infrastructure or other people's wallets: 0x8366a39CC670B4001A1121B8F6A443A643e40951 (v4 PoolManager), 0x4123Ffc81579e38dfFf74b75D8BdF21C41E62237 (farmer, 1,846 tokens), 0x00000000Cf1cD5867BE5D90B99A6EBd683BC031c (solver), 0x7e3Ba68C49561AaE7c23C1d20fEF0F1D7615a3ad and 0x56E95b47A07210f1eA9fA418C7c5DC164C419Ac0 (already tracked in strongtrader)
- fomo.family: the /profile/OGDfarmer URL resolves but the profile pane never renders, the same signature as DineroDom0's empty account. No wallet named there

## THE NFT SCREEN, RUN 30 Aug 2026 — it came back EMPTY, and that is the answer
- Method: pulled every chain-wide mint log (topic0 Transfer with topic1 = zero address) for 20 Jul 22:00 to 21 Jul 21:10 UTC, which covers his whole US Eastern day up to the post. 1,395,874 mint logs, of which 249,089 are ERC-721 (four topics). 618 distinct collections minted that day, 34,012 distinct recipients
- Most of that volume is LP position NFTs. The real infrastructure collections to exclude are Uniswap v4 Positions 0x58daec3116aae6d93017baaea7749052e8a04fa7, Uniswap V3 Positions 0x73991a25c818bf1f1128deaab1492d45638de0d3 and Based V3 Positions 0x1f7f9a590221d28a7e82f046fa444139f2aecb68
- Screen A, WIRE holders who minted a quality-art collection that day: 13 addresses. None carries his book. The only broad one is 0x00000000cf1cd5867be5d90b99a6ebd683bc031c, a solver contract
- Screen B, no art-guess bias, WIRE BUYERS 17-21 Jul (1,721, so it does not require him to still hold) intersected with minters of ANY non-LP collection on 21 Jul: 40 addresses. Best book among them is 0xd4e3f654c2a4b4bb778e712feb214e87d35b0f2d at $7,230 total. Nothing resembling a man who calls INDEX his biggest bag and holds a fuckton of AI
- FOUR independent screens have now failed: the 6 Aug HMM+TENDIES dated buy, WIRE x INDEX, all WIRE holders above $800, and the NFT day

## VERDICT after the NFT screen
- The Robinhood Chain record does NOT contain a wallet carrying DFarmer's stated book. Ranked explanations: (1) he holds RH positions inside the Robinhood app rather than on-chain, which fits his own wording "I log into my account and I see everything"; (2) he uses a separate wallet per token, which defeats every intersection screen; (3) his positions are far smaller than his language implies
- Do not force a name here. The difference from the DineroDom hunt is instructive: Dom's wallets fell out of a dated multi-token buy post in four steps, and DFarmer's equivalent post produced nothing at all

## X follow timestamps — asked by Ben, answered
- X does not expose them. GET /2/users/:id/following returns no followed_at field and the UI shows none. The Following tab is ordered newest first, so you can BRACKET a follow between two neighbours, but you cannot date it
- The workable substitute is a daily snapshot diff of his following list, which gives one-day resolution on every NEW follow. That is the same tell DineroDom used in his MOO thread ("Fern follows Natan_benish days ago"). It is a forward narrative signal, useful for a bot, and it identifies no wallet