--- name: neetolympics-wallet description: The 10 Sep 2026 hunt for X caller @NeetOlympics ("Nostradamus", 8.9k followers, "Come win with the Winnies"), who called AI at $509k on 17 Jul and holds MOO. His two Robinhood Chain trading wallets, the evidence, and what was ruled out (fomo, pump.fun, BasedBot). Read before any Nostradamus screen or alert bot. sources: [cowork] aliases: [NeetOlympics, "@NeetOlympics", Nostradamus, nossy, neet-olympics] --- # Request - [stated] Ben pasted three screenshots (his 18 Jul "Some RH coins I really like: HODL, RWA, 馃殌, AI" post, the AI chart at $509k, his profile) and asked to find his wallet via the X API, posts, replies and timestamps; said he was early to AI and holds MOO now, and "stonks apparently". # Findings (10 Sep 2026) - 2,754 tweets pulled since 15 Jun (from:NeetOlympics, 3-day windows), saved at /root/neet/x.json. His RH calls with UTC times: HODL 16 Jul 21:21, AI + RWA 17 Jul 18:19 (AI ~$509k), MOON 0x06fCba306b81b049bC3a8431b246F94722c03c38 18 Jul 11:31, AUNI 24 Jul, COCO 0x714D5592D4758F9AbBb5705A8925FfD6C6bA4Cb2 26 Jul, PUSSY 29 Jul, "1 cow on $SBS" 0x9f773D0fA2578303A69E6A94f117b4B418867777 30 Jul, UNIPEG 0xD3D5bE6558F84e628EE091B511Df92b4e461a53b 9 Aug, SWOLE 26 Aug, DELTA "LP infra bag" 30 Aug, PROLOGUE 30 Aug, CHIPS 0xbcd09284dffe06f868a4650546233e3e9abe4d97 4 Sep, BOXY 8 Sep 19:18, MOO 9 Sep 23:26. AI exit tweet 28 Aug 07:55 ("exiting most of it now, clipping at $90M"). - Method: for 16 calls, pulled every Transfer in the 24 to 60 h before the post, scored recipients, dropped contracts and nonce > 5k bots, then per-coin minute deltas. # Wallets - PRIMARY (high confidence): 0xd048558edbf485f56e2410ba9e20b7d458c9b1fb, EOA, first active 18 Jul, 221 tokens, 48 active days. Sold its whole AI stack 26 to 28 Aug, last clip 28 Aug 05:54, two hours before his "exiting most of it now" tweet; bought BOXY 8 Sep 18:29 (11 min after launch, 49 min before his BOXY post) and still holds 228,725; holds 1,209,680 CHIPS (the CA he posted "I mean this one" on 4 Sep); SWOLE bought 26 Aug 02:21, 20 h before his post, holds 624,966; UNIPEG bought 3.3 h before his "slow cook" reply; MOO bought 7.6 h before his 9 Sep post, holds 56,466; COCO and the SBS cow bought hours before he posted the CAs. ETH comes in via the shared RH relayers (0xf70da97812CB96acDF810712Aa562db8dfA3dbEF and others, nonce > 1M), so no personal funding link. - SECOND (medium): 0x03b2355b40a5857e84cc2991ce4f1648aacee1db, EOA nonce 2,365, first active 9 Jul, 487 tokens, 62 active days. Bought AI 14 Jul 19:45 (launch day, 3 days before his call), sold most 15 Jul; HODL (197 legs), RWA, COCO (7 h before), SBS cow (5.6 h before), SWOLE (21 h before), MOO 45,678 held; MOON bought 4.7 min AFTER his "this one?" reply. Sold its AI 24 to 25 Aug. Covers the July calls that predate the primary wallet. No direct transfer between the two wallets. - Both are "daily" wallets: hundreds of coins, fast flips, small MOO bags (~$1k each). His tweets say "I multiwallet 40% beforehand" and "6 fig realized monthly PnL on my daily wallets (non conviction)", so a separate conviction wallet likely exists and was not found. # Re-check (same day, Ben: "I'm pretty certain this must be one wallet") - Direct test: every AI seller in his two exit windows (28 Aug 03:00 to 08:30, "exiting most of it now" 07:55; 3 Sep 04:00 to 07:00, "continuing to shave" 06:03) = 209 addresses. Only ONE human wallet is in both AND bought his other calls before he posted: 0xd048558edbf485f56e2410ba9e20b7d458c9b1fb (7 of his calls). 0x03b2355b40a5857e84cc2991ce4f1648aacee1db is in neither exit window (sold its AI 24 to 25 Aug), so it is demoted to "unproven, probably not him". - Extra confirmation: his 2 Sep reply listed "Moo Spacehood Ap Johndog Yolo" as the RH coins he is in; 0xd048 holds AP 7.46M, MOO 56k, SPACEHOOD 166k today. - Holdings 10 Sep (priced): about $12.6k total. AP $2.5k, MOO $2.1k, MONITOR $2.0k, SWOLE $1.0k, CAT, SPACEHOOD $0.8k, PIZZA, O1BOT, LOCKHEEDINU, BOXY $0.2k, plus dust. No AI left. A small "daily" wallet, matching his own words about daily wallets vs a conviction wallet. - Open mismatch: this wallet's first AI buy is 3 Aug, not "below $500k" as he claims; the sub-500k entry is either rhetorical or in a wallet not found. # Third pass (Ben: "he obviously owned HODL, RWA, AI and the rocket at that time, look for those") - Holder snapshot at the block of his 17 Jul 18:19 post: only 18 addresses held HODL + RWA + AI together; after removing pools, bots and 1000-token airdrop dust, five real wallets. Tested against his later posts, one stands out. - CONVICTION WALLET (found here, the real one): 0xfd6e86cf9aeca787cffb198bca859d459a44a847, EIP-7702 delegated to 0x612373d7003d694220f7800eeaf8e3924c0951d3 (not fomo, not the Uniswap/pump Calibur delegate), nonce 2,004, 1,522 tokens, 27k legs since 4 Jul. Bought 11,173,994 AI on 15 Jul 20:42 (launch day, sub-$500k, matching "a chart you entered below $500k"), added 16 and 19 Jul, sold down in 100k to 500k clips from 22 Jul, 3.5M sold 4 Aug (his 21 Aug "asking if I got fully out at 20 million"), 1.5M sold 29 Aug 04:07 after the 28 Aug "exiting most" post, 25k clips 2 Sep and 50k clips 3 to 9 Sep ("continuing to shave", 3 Sep). STILL HOLDS 1,350,000 AI (~$269k at $0.1994) and 3,000,001 MOO (~$115k at $0.0385). RWA bought 15 Jul 07:41 (launch morning), 7.3M, sold by 1 Aug. HODL 4,521 only. DELTA (old) 8M bought 2 to 3 Aug, sold through 1 Sep ("LP infra bag" 30 Aug). AP 7.4M bought 3 Sep, sold 4 Sep. MOO first bought 22 Jul (7.8M), traded in and out, rebuilt 31 Aug. - 0xd048558edbf485f56e2410ba9e20b7d458c9b1fb stays as his DAILY wallet: it holds BOXY ("my $Boxy tokens"), SWOLE, CHIPS, small AP/MOO/SPACEHOOD, and sold AI two hours before the 28 Aug post. 0xfd6e86 never touched BOXY, SWOLE or CHIPS, so the two are complementary, exactly his own split ("6 fig realized monthly on my daily wallets (non conviction)"). - The rocket cashtag was never resolved: no token with symbol 馃殌 existed on 17 Jul; his own 18 Jul reply pointed at MOON 0x06fCba306b81b049bC3a8431b246F94722c03c38 ("TO THE MOON"), which neither wallet held at the post. - 0x03b2355b40a5857e84cc2991ce4f1648aacee1db: held HODL/RWA/AI at the post too, but no BOXY, tiny MOO, no AI left, sold AI 24 to 25 Aug. Not him. # Portfolio by size, 12 Sep 2026 (Ben asked "what is nostradamus portfolio by size") - Method: Blockscout v2 `/api/v2/addresses/{a}/tokens?type=ERC-20` (paged, from Chrome on the Mac, it 403s from the droplet), using the `exchange_rate` field it returns, then every zero-rate token repriced from DexScreener. Spot-checked the top 10 against DexScreener prices and they agree within 1 to 13%, so the figures are sound. NOTE the field is `token.address_hash`, not `token.address`. - **CONVICTION 0xfd6e86cf9aeca787cffb198bca859d459a44a847: about $1,123,000 across 800+ tokens, but 83% sits in six.** AI $344,810 (30.7%, 1,000,000 left, still shaving) 路 ASTEROID $112,773 (10.0%) 路 BONER $106,964 (9.5%) 路 ORBIO $86,491 (7.7%) 路 MOO $80,409 (7.2%, 3,000,000) 路 SHROOM $53,737 (4.8%) 路 CEREBRO $44,217 路 MANY $41,959 路 GRASS $39,627 路 CME $28,446 路 INU $27,365 路 FLYBRAIN $26,655 路 MONEY $14,688 路 OPEN $13,548. Only 0.019 ETH of dry powder. - **DAILY 0xd048558edbf485f56e2410ba9e20b7d458c9b1fb: about $12,770**, still the small flipper. AP $2,974 路 SCHIFFY $1,622 路 LOCKHEEDINU $1,551 路 MOO $1,513 路 YOLO $1,490 路 MICRODUCK $788 路 ANTHROPIG $633 路 AMD $240 路 QUBIT $233 路 PIZZA $218. - The two wallets are 99% / 1% by value, which settles the "conviction versus daily" split with numbers rather than inference. - New names since the 10 Sep pass that were never in his tweets: ASTEROID, ORBIO, SHROOM, CEREBRO, MANY, FLYBRAIN. **He is holding six figures in coins he has never posted about**, so his public calls are not a map of his book. # CHALLENGE PASS, 12 Sep 2026: a THIRD wallet found, and the "never posts about his bags" puzzle - [stated] Ben doubted the whole attribution: "It doesn't make much sense to me that he wouldn't post about his holdings." - **He was right to push. A falsification test broke the single-wallet story.** On 5 Sep 14:11 he posted about Ponshouse: "and you are not betting on Ponshouse? **1% and continuing to accumulate**". That is a self-declared, checkable position. **Neither 0xfd6e86 nor 0xd048 has ever touched ANY of the four PONSHOUSE contracts.** - **So I went the other way: from the claim to the wallet.** Top holders of PONSHOUSE `0xdb44179AE5b7d25EF913035E9408D44B630DA69B` (1B supply), filtered to EOAs near 1%, then scored each on his other public positions. One fits exactly: - **THIRD WALLET `0xf23817f6d701f514861fe44371756e3226de8fef`, plain EOA, no 7702 delegation, 1,539 txs, 29.573 ETH of dry powder.** It bought PONSHOUSE in **8 clips straight from the Uniswap v4 PoolManager, 3 on 4 Sep 20:42 and 5 on 5 Sep 09:25, totalling 19.4M = 1.94% of supply, finishing under five hours BEFORE the tweet**. "1% and continuing to accumulate" is what that tape looks like. Its book: **AI 1,920,000 = $662,028**, HOTDOG $14,624, URMOM $11,551, NUDES $5,287, WORTH $4,021, GRASS $3,913, CHROME $2,202, SPCX, TTWO, FLY. Total about **$718,000**. - **No direct transfer either way between 0xf23817 and 0xfd6e86**, so the link is behavioural, not a funding graph. That is normal here: every wallet is funded through the shared RH relayers. - **Where that leaves the attribution, stated honestly:** `0xfd6e86` still matches his AI narrative better than anything else found (first buy 15 Jul 20:42 on launch day at sub-$500k exactly as he claims, 14.81M bought in 7 legs, 13.81M sold in **53** clips which is literally "continuing to shave", about 1.0M still held, and it holds iNu which he called "Inu of this cycle" on 5 Sep). `0xf23817` matches the Ponshouse claim and is the bigger AI holder. **Either he runs both (he says "I multiwallet 40% beforehand"), or one of them is a different AI whale and I cannot yet say which.** - **The six unposted bags are real buys, not airdrops** (checked the acquisition leg of each): ASTEROID came in 21 Jul from the **RobinHoodSettler** `0x1d4B86491ec211257cbedD77A4380a7494624EfF`, and ORBIO, SHROOM, CEREBRO, MANY, FLYBRAIN all came in from the settlement contract `0x00000000009726632680FB29d3F7A9734E3010E2` between 1 and 12 Sep. Swapped for, not received free. So the "holds six figures in coins he never mentions" fact stands on its own regardless of which wallet is his. - **CORRECTION to the 10 Sep note above: the 7702 delegate `0x612373d7003d694220f7800eeaf8e3924c0951d3` IS `CaliburEntry`, Uniswap's smart-wallet implementation.** The earlier line saying it was "not the Uniswap/pump Calibur delegate" is wrong. It tells us which app drives the wallet, nothing about identity. - **METHOD THAT EARNED ITS PLACE, and it belongs in every wallet hunt: take one self-declared, quantified position ("1% of X") and test the candidate wallet against it.** Confirming evidence assembled from a suspect wallet's own history is cheap and circular; a claim made in public BEFORE you look, with a number in it, is a real falsifier. This one broke a two-day-old conclusion in a single query. - STILL OPEN: whether 0xf23817 is his; a fourth wallet holding the rest; and whether 0xfd6e86 is him at all. # VERIFICATION PASS, 12 Sep 2026 (Ben: "check again to make sure"). THE BIG WALLETS ARE NOT PROVEN. - **Built the scorecard that should have existed from the start: 15 coins he NAMED as his own, tested against all three candidate wallets as ever-held / never-held.** The five in the 2 Sep list ("Moo Spacehood Ap Johndog Yolo") are the core of it because he wrote them as a list of what he is in, unprompted. | coin (his own claim) | 0xd048558edbf485f56e2410ba9e20b7d458c9b1fb | 0xfd6e86cf9aeca787cffb198bca859d459a44a847 | 0xf23817f6d701f514861fe44371756e3226de8fef | |---|---|---|---| | MOO | yes | yes | **no** | | SPACEHOOD | yes | **no** | yes | | AP | yes | yes | yes | | JOHNDOG | yes | **no** | **no** | | YOLO | yes | yes | **no** | | BOXY | yes | **no** | **no** | | SWOLE | yes | **no** | **no** | | CHIPS `0xbcd09284dffe06f868a4650546233e3e9abe4d97` | yes | yes | yes | | DELTA | yes | yes | **no** | | UNIPEG | yes | **no** | **no** | | COCO | yes | **no** | **no** | | SBS cow | yes | **no** | **no** | | PONSHOUSE | **no** | **no** | yes | | MOON | no | no | no | | **score** | **12 of 15** | 5 of 15 | 4 of 15 | - **CONCLUSION, and it reverses the 10 Sep "conviction wallet" call: only `0xd048558edbf485f56e2410ba9e20b7d458c9b1fb` is PROVEN his.** It is the only wallet that holds all five coins of his own 2 Sep list, and it carries eight more of his calls bought before he posted them. **It is worth about $12,770.** - `0xfd6e86` fails on SPACEHOOD and JOHNDOG, which he explicitly said he was in on 2 Sep, and on BOXY ("my $Boxy tokens"), SWOLE, UNIPEG, COCO and SBS. Its AI story fits him, but "bought AI on launch day and sold it in clips" describes every early AI whale, not a person. **Demote to UNPROVEN. The $1,123,000 figure must not be reported as his.** - `0xf23817` fails on MOO, YOLO, JOHNDOG and everything else except PONSHOUSE, SPACEHOOD, AP and CHIPS. The Ponshouse 1.94% timed five hours before the tweet is still the single best coincidence in the file, but on its own it is one hit against eleven misses. **Also UNPROVEN.** - **THE LESSON, and it is the one to carry into every future wallet hunt: an intersection test (who held A and B and C at time T) finds CANDIDATES, never OWNERS.** Five wallets held HODL+RWA+AI on 17 Jul; picking the one whose later trades "felt right" is confirmation bias with extra steps. **The only evidence that survives is a list of positions the person declared BEFORE you looked, scored as a hit rate across many independent coins, with the misses counted out loud.** A wallet that matches 12 of 15 is him; a wallet that matches 4 or 5 of 15 is a stranger who trades the same board. - Practical consequence for Ben: **there is no six or seven figure Nostradamus book that has been proven.** The proven wallet is small, matching his own words that his daily wallets are non-conviction. His real conviction wallet, if it exists, is still unfound, and the next attempt should start from a fresh dated claim with a number in it rather than from holder intersections. # CO-BUY PASS, 12 Sep 2026 (Ben: "look again"). HIS MULTIWALLET CLAIM DOES NOT SHOW ON CHAIN. - Premise, derived rather than assumed: he says "**I multiwallet 40% beforehand**". If that is literally true, his other wallets buy the SAME coin within seconds of the proven wallet, again and again. Random whales cannot do that across many independent coins. So the co-buy count IS the identity test, and it needs no guessing about which wallet "feels right". - Built `/root/cobuy2.py` on the droplet (also `cobuy3.py`, the tight-window variant). **The trick that makes it cheap: find the known wallet's own buys with a TOPIC FILTER (`topics: [Transfer, null, padded_recipient]`) over the whole chain in ONE `eth_getLogs` call, instead of scanning every transfer of the token.** A full scan of one token took 10+ minutes and was abandoned; the topic-filtered version answers in 2 to 30 seconds per token. Then pull all recipients only inside the windows around those blocks. - **Run 1, window +/- 9,000 blocks (15 min), 12 coins:** useless. 421 to 2,198 other buyers per coin, and dozens of wallets share 6 or 7 coins with him purely by volume. **At 15-minute resolution on a busy chain, co-occurrence carries no information.** - **Run 2, window +/- 30 blocks (about 3 seconds):** the noise collapses to 3 to 17 others per coin, and **every single wallet at the top is infrastructure, not a person**: `0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951` (Uniswap v4 PoolManager) 8 coins, `0x8f10b468b06c6fd214b65f87778827f7d113f996` 8, `0xb92fe925dc43a0ecde6c8b1a2709c170ec4fff4f` (router) 7, `0x6f02324d20cc679d0e585290caa6b16bacbc0f77` (RehypeDopplerHookInitializer) 5, `0x4e3468951d49f2eea976ed0d6e75ffcb44a9a544` (DopplerHookInitializer) 5, `0x39b38686a19836ac10162c490e4558e120cbbe5f` (RobinHoodSettler) 4. **Checked each with eth_getCode: all contracts. The best EOA scores 1 coin, i.e. chance.** - **CONCLUSION: there is no second wallet buying alongside `0xd048558edbf485f56e2410ba9e20b7d458c9b1fb` at second resolution on any of his twelve named coins.** Three readings, and the file should not pretend to choose between them yet: (a) the multiwallet claim is talk, (b) he splits across coins and time rather than buying the same coin twice at once, or (c) the other wallets trade coins he never names, which is exactly what cannot be tested from his posts. - **Either way it closes the question Ben asked twice: the big wallets are not his, and no on-chain sibling of the proven wallet exists to be found this way.** `0xfd6e86...` and `0xf23817...` both score ZERO co-buys inside 3 seconds, which is one more independent strike against each. - Cost note: the whole co-buy study is ~90 seconds of droplet time once the topic-filter trick is used. **Worth running as the FIRST test in any future "find his other wallets" job, before any holder intersection.** - Shipping trap that cost a cycle and belongs in the standing rules: `echo "$B64" | ssh host 'base64 -d > f.py && python3 -c "ast.parse(...)" && setsid nohup python3 f.py &'` **silently wrote a ZERO-BYTE file** (the trailing `&` broke the chain) **and `ast.parse("")` SUCCEEDS, so the syntax check passed on an empty file.** Always verify a shipped file with `wc -c` and `md5sum` against the local copy, never with a parse check alone. # Ruled out - fomo: handle NeetOlympics exists (id 9405d093-b50c-59c8-84dc-eb9d0212a4f9, evm 0x4da3118bdcc6913b1e5c341e1d734f9fc9c04d3e, sol 5TPJ3zjkj4BYD7gKSKbY4wDDnswfoD3J9LLsxXs4cm2G) but only 7 swaps, $6.9k volume, zero RH trades. Not his trading wallet. - pump.fun usernames NeetOlympics (none), nostradamus and nossy (1 follower, no bio): not him. - His PnL cards are BasedBot (basedbot.app) portfolio shares under the name @nossy; BasedBot profiles are private, no wallet exposed. "10k daily PnL Hitler coin" and "$Doom" (2 to 4 Aug) are Solana, not RH.