---
name: rh-arena-vaults
description: The LONG community vault addresses on Robinhood Chain, the MOO-vs-BONER re-run of 4 Sep 2026, and the two corrections it forced. Read with [[rh-memestock-arena]] before any claim about a LONG token's vault, burn or "ecosystem pool" catalyst.
sources: [cowork]
aliases: [long-vaults, community-vault, moo-vs-boner, arena-vaults]
---

# LONG community vaults and the 4 Sep 2026 MOO vs BONER re-run

Continuation of [[rh-memestock-arena]], which hit its size cap. Companion to [[rh-launchpad-sector]], [[screen-log]].

- [stated] 4 Sep 2026 Ben: "double check everything again, check twitter via api for news, claims, posts from dinerodom and the long dot xyz team, and do the same for Boner. also check the chain metrics, and fomo thesis."

## THE VAULT ADDRESSES. This closes an UNRESOLVED and corrects two earlier FALSE calls.
**METHOD THAT FOUND IT: rank holders by net balance from `erc20_robinhood.evt_Transfer` (sum in minus sum out), then `eth_getCode` every row. The vault is a 6,550-byte contract sitting in the top 15 holders. It is NOT the address the fee splitter pays out to.** Both earlier passes looked at the payout EOA and concluded "no vault".

| token | VAULT ADDRESS (6,550-byte contract) | holds | USD |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI | 0xd14d2eeb9648f53fa153a218eeed908789c28630 | 8,491,686 AI + 1,027.28 NVDA | **$2,557,912** |
| MOO | 0x31a3edf92b49407c04215d4b744f231460a2da32 | 10,036,727 MOO + 61.72 MU | **$375,490** |
| INCEL | 0xdbcb4ae58a91aac6addfb5fd7109a35c3574b1c1 | 8,919,628 INCEL + 93.10 INTC | **$20,282** |

- **CORRECTION, made twice and wrong twice: "MOO has no vault, its fees go to a drained bare EOA" is FALSE.** 0xbcc8ed8b7e851f5af66591130def7e3066e6588d (EOA, holds 128,702 MOO) is the **team payout leg**, not the vault. This also corrects the 2 Sep line in [[rh-memestock-arena]] that said no vault exists and nothing has ever been recycled.
- **@OPanciotti's X claim that AI, MOO, INCEL and AAPLCAT have all activated the community vault is CONFIRMED for the first three.**
- MOO vault flow: 0x31a3edf9 has burned **10,036,727 MOO to 0x0 across 210 legs**, last 3 Sep 19:23, and paid 19,944,752 MOO to the team EOA, which forwarded 42,654,092 MOO onward to 0x5a945cd505c3fd0be2ef55cabab391a45d9610ff (EOA, now empty).
- **BONER HAS NO VAULT CONTRACT.** Its 95% beneficiary 0x79aeae6a47ff2e551f60bd87dbd6358efeaf4dc8 is a 23-byte EIP-7702 wallet acting as a **general-purpose fee-claim relayer across dozens of unrelated RH tokens** (43.7M of 0x85856f025bf13b8fd2aae2f6da458318744f1e18, 31.3M of 0x3774cfd1efafb86aa001e3df50de54e62ef637cd, 30.8M of 0x3a1b71492a19479608781875a2c28253a97af67b), forwarding most onward to 0x8876789976decbfcbbbe364623c63652db8c0904 (24,546-byte contract). It holds 1,693,263 BONER + 449.10 HIMS.
- Burns: **MOO 10,036,727 = 1.00% of supply. BONER 140 tokens = $6.**
- **So the tokenomics ranking inverts the market ranking: MOO has the working vault and the burn, BONER has neither.**

## THE DINERODOM CATALYST IS NOT CONFIRMED BY THE TEAM
- An earlier note recorded "BONER is confirmed, MOO is a deduction." **That overstates it.** Nate's actual reply to DineroDom was the single word *"interesting. LONG."*
- **@Natan_benish, 4 Sep 02:38 UTC, 25,901 views, the load-bearing post:** *"reminder the only way to verify an asset truly launched on @longdotxyz and have full support + security guarantee on our end is checking the CA on our app. LONG only supports pairs with NVDA3x (Demo), AI and stock listed on our app. I will work with terminals to remove any LONG label on assets which were not launched via our UI."*
- **BONER- and MOO-quoted pools ALREADY EXIST and the team is disowning them.** Live: HARDER/BONER (created 3 Sep 21:42, $77,877 liq, $2.40M vol24), HARD/BONER (2 Sep 23:35), RODMAN/BONER (4 Sep 03:13); MILKING/MOO (3 Sep 21:57), STEAK/MOO (4 Sep 01:13), microduck/MOO ($849). Permissionless third-party launches, not the LONG ecosystem pool. **The trade being front-run has partly already happened and is explicitly unsupported.**
- **AI is already an approved numeraire, and that is the live version of the advantage.** BONER/AI: $1,653,540 liq, $2.16M vol24. MOO/AI: $2,732.

## UNITS CORRECTION — DexScreener marketCap is stale on both names
**Compute price x supply instead.** DexScreener printed MOO $31,167,237 and BONER $71,654,336. True values **MOO $13.98M** ($0.01413 x 989.4M) and **BONER $47.0M** ($0.04700 x 999.9M), matching fomo's $13.8M and $45.3M. Every mcap quoted from that field earlier in the 4 Sep session was too high.

## Market state, 4 Sep ~06:05 UTC
| | BONER | MOO |
|---|---|---|
| mcap (px x supply) | $47.0M | $13.98M |
| aggregate liquidity | $5,183,106 | $1,564,378 |
| vol24 / turnover | $21.9M / 4.2x | $6.89M / 4.4x |
| m5 / h1 / h6 / h24 | +0.4% / -14.6% / -24.7% / **-8.9%** | -5.9% / -20.4% / -28.8% / **-44.2%** |
| h1 buys vs sells | 1,090 / 973 | 443 / 539 |
| fomo holders / top-10 | 17K / 15.64% | 5K / 14.49% |

## Chain context, and it is the strongest input in the whole read
- Robinhood Chain TVL **$832,916,172**, up from $638,227,485 on 27 Aug: **+30.5% in 8 days, no down day.**
- DEX volume 24h **$1,686,257,877, +98.2% week on week.** Fees 24h $16,460,086, 30d $160,470,294, +194% w/w.
- @longdotxyz 3 Sep 23:24: *"$632M. LONG has now generated 16% of all RWA DEX volume onchain since Robinhood launched, with AI/NVDA accounting for 20% of it."* Directionally consistent with DefiLlama; the 16% share itself UNRESOLVED.

## X and fomo audit, 4 Sep
- **PHISHING LIVE ON BONER, heavy.** Sub-50-follower accounts (@31NJPgflZ9JQpWZ 46f, @ITSYABOIRAZOR 186f) posting *"claim worked for me"* and *"didn't expect to see eligibility there"* with the **correct CA 0x98096d17e191B3dA1d5f99a6D7b3584351b11E18** plus a link. Same drainer pattern as the MOO and FATCOIN campaigns.
- **Vote-farm bot campaign on BONER**: dozens of near-identical posts ("Every vote counts — Pons spotlight would be huge for visibility", "Listing ID: 8608", "Robinhood Top 100 Leaderboard") from 8f to 721f accounts inside 15 minutes. Engagement farm.
- **Tier one: BONER has it, MOO does not.** @blknoiz06 (1,393,299f) 1 Sep, 2,088 likes: *"half of .eth twitter has me blocked for shilling solana and memecoins last cycle and now theyre writing long form theses on boner coin, i was right"*. @0xkioto (12,551f) covers LONG and AI, never MOO. Direct `from:` on theunipcs, CrashiusClay69, dontbuytops, pingucharts returns **zero** on both tickers.
- **fomo thesis depth is 3.8x in BONER's favour: 11.1K holders with theses vs MOO's 2,923.** Largest books: BONER @econoar $1,514,736 at +2,190% (entry $1.9M mcap), @workethic $716,721, @himgajria $696,615 at +4,792%. MOO: @cashmachine $331,545, @TizzWhisperer $307,774 at +1,827%.
- **Every large fomo holder on both names is up 100% to 45,000%.** No cohort has a loss point, so no price forces them out and every level up is a distribution opportunity for them.

## Verdict carried, 4 Sep
- **BONER stays the pick**, on liquidity (3.3x), holders (3.4x), tier-one coverage, the already-live AI pool, and the far shallower drawdown. MOO only as a separate smaller lottery.
- **But the honest ledger now says MOO wins on mechanism**: a real vault holding $375,490 and a 1.00% burn, against BONER's zero of both. If Ben is buying the LONG value-accrual thesis rather than the momentum, MOO is the coin that actually has it running.
- Falsifiers for BONER, carried: (1) holders fall on 3 consecutive daily reads (2) turnover above 20x for 2 consecutive days (3) a vault contract never appears and the burn stays under 0.1% of supply two weeks from now.
- Falsifier for MOO: the vault 0x31a3edf92b49407c04215d4b744f231460a2da32 stops burning, or its MU balance falls.

## 4 Sep later: Ben pushes back on "sell MOO", and he is right
- [stated] Ben's case for MOO: DineroDom (@DineroDom0) and his podcast MCG Live are the main alpha source right now and are pushing it; DineroDom holds a big bag and says so. Blunt Capital, whom Ben respects, is out. Ben does not believe unipcs is in. MOO is on longdotxyz, the team pushes AI very hard, MOO is the second biggest runner and they are friendly with the LONG team. Ben wants exposure to the "all the main stock-ticker pairs do well" narrative.
- [stated] Ben reads DELTA as a clear Robinhood infrastructure bet that feels safer than MOO with the same or higher upside.
- **CORRECTION to my own "sell MOO" call**, which was made off one day of tape (-31%, 2,691 sells vs 1,573 buys) against a structural position. Revised to HOLD. The tape was rotation into BONER on the day BONER got named first for the ecosystem pool, not terminal distribution.
- **Ben's premise "the community chest will probably be activated for MOO soon" is out of date: it is ALREADY live.** Vault 0x31a3edf92b49407c04215d4b744f231460a2da32, $375,490, 10,036,727 MOO burned = 1.00% of supply. Also confirmed by @bftdtrading 3 Sep that AI, MOO and OPTIMUS all show the vault activated.
- What is still NOT confirmed is DineroDom's 4 Sep 02:18 line ("Nate literally just confirmed... safe to deduce $MOO would follow"). Nate's actual reply was "interesting. LONG." and 36 minutes later he posted that LONG only supports NVDA3x, AI and stocks listed on their app. Front-running that deduction is front-running an inference, not an announcement.
- Corroborated 4 Sep: MOO/MU holds 20%+ of chain MU the way AI/NVDA holds 21%+ of chain NVDA (@cartography_cap). Poloniex listed MOO 3 Sep (@Poloniex, 659,334 followers). memorycowmoo's stated plan is to curate the vault into an onchain DRAM basket (MU, SNDK).
- **The point Ben was missing: he already owns this narrative through OPTIMUS**, which also has the community vault activated and was +89% on the day MOO was -31%.