---
name: uberm-wallets-2
description: Continuation of uberm-wallets.md from 6 Sep 2026, after that file hit its size cap. The three @0xuberM wallets named and graded by strength of proof, plus the ELON confirmation. Read both.
sources: [cowork]
aliases: [0xuberM part 2, uberM wallets 2, uberm-side-wallet]
---
Continues [[uberm-wallets]].

## THE THREE WALLETS, NAMED AND GRADED, 6 Sep 2026

- [stated] Ben: "Make sure to name his three wallets accordingly... The one that we clearly know is his. That's his off-formal trading wallet. The former wallet. What's the other one? What's the proof that that's really his?" The labels below are now set in the alert bot config, so every alert says which wallet moved.

### 1. UBERM TRADING (the real one, off fomo) — 0xdce001e4ec11ab58650c51ae9658accbe0f49c48
- $589,443 book on DeBank, 71% of it AI. Where he actually trades.
- Evidence is behavioural but deep: five dated post matches (AI bought 19 min after its pool opened, MOO 23 Jul, iCoin 2 Sep, SPACEHOOD held then fully sold 2 Sep, and holding exactly the three coins he named), PLUS the ELON trade Ben supplied independently and which the wallet had made.
- No cryptographic link to the other two. Grade: STRONG, not proven.

### 2. UBERM PUBLIC (his fomo account) — 0xcf6cdf01acb524d8e53d1d13b1a89fcadbd7034c
- **THIS ONE IS PROVEN.** Five exact balance matches against his named public fomo profile, re-checked 6 Sep: FIRE 12,471,299.50 vs the profile's "12.4M", NVDA 0.1911 vs 0.191, GME 1.3520 vs 1.35, GLD 0.0678 vs 0.0678, AMC 15.6985 vs 15.70.
- Tokenised stock contracts used for that check: NVDA 0xd0601ce157db5bdc3162bbac2a2c8af5320d9eec, GME 0x1b0e319c6a659f002271b69db8a7df2f911c153e, GLD 0xc9a981fee1f9dec688bb123ccdecc63d0debfc4e, AMC 0x05a3d1cd21d0c88145e82600e62e7e496e0f222b.
- This is the wallet everyone can see. Small, mostly FIRE plus stock dust.

### 3. UBERM SIDE (probable, NOT proven) — 0xc3a76958cb75bd3070462515916fa6ff2564c405
- **NEW EVIDENCE AGAINST, found while answering this question: its stock balances do NOT match his fomo profile.** It holds NVDA 0.2008, GME 2.4841, GLD 0.0468, AMC 3.0467 against the profile's 0.191 / 1.35 / 0.0678 / 15.70. Four mismatches. So this wallet's holdings are NOT what his public account displays. It is a DIFFERENT account, not the one he shows.
- FOR: it received 10,000,000 FIRE from the PUBLIC wallet on 23 Aug, and that is the PUBLIC wallet's ONLY non-router transfer in 416 legs across its entire life.
- FOR, and this is the tightest single item: the IMD sequence. Bought IMD on Ethereum 2 Sep 16:25 UTC, forwarded all 4,231.7479 to a fresh wallet at 17:03, paid that wallet 0.01 ETH of gas at 17:04, staked into StakedIMD at 17:55. **His "I bought a coin on Ethereum today" post is stamped 9/3 01:07 in Ben's local time, which is 2 Sep 18:07 UTC, twelve minutes after that stake completed.**
- AGAINST: 0x62cfc82b6dea627d75d63feb47db18fcfea18df4, a real active RH trader, sent it 50,000 "worth" three minutes BEFORE the FIRE arrived, so a third party knew the address. It also has an independent life on Base since Nov 2025 and on Ethereum since Apr 2026.
- HONEST VERDICT: either his second fomo account under a handle not yet found, or a counterparty he does business with. **Do not describe it as his without the caveat.**
- **HOW TO SETTLE IT:** find the fomo handle whose displayed book matches NVDA 0.2008 / GME 2.4841 / GLD 0.0468 / AMC 3.0467. The fomo per-token Holders tab lists handles with positions, so this is a lookup, not a guess.

### Fourth address, downstream of SIDE
- 0x27491ec5c75b7090051c395ac20e0412b40ca57d, the IMD staker. Proven to belong to whoever owns SIDE (same wallet funded both its tokens and its gas, one minute apart). Holds 535.4465 sIMD, about $10,664. Not in the alert bot because it is a staking sink, not a trading wallet.

## FINAL ALERT CONFIG, 6 Sep 2026 (Ben's decision)
- [stated] Ben: "Remove the third one from the alert, and only give me the first one, which we call trading wallet, and then the second one, which we call former wallet. And I need real-time alerts on both."
- 0XUBERM ALERT now watches exactly TWO wallets, labelled in the config as Ben named them:
  - **UBER M TRADING** = 0xdce001e4ec11ab58650c51ae9658accbe0f49c48
  - **UBER M FOMO** = 0xcf6cdf01acb524d8e53d1d13b1a89fcadbd7034c
  - [stated] Ben corrected the naming: "Not former wallet. One is called Uber M Trading, and one is called Uber M Fomo." Use those exact two names everywhere.
- 0xc3a76958cb75bd3070462515916fa6ff2564c405 was REMOVED from the alert. Its research stays above in case it is ever needed again, but do not re-add it without Ben asking.
- poll_seconds lowered from 4 to 2 for real time. Buys, sells and transfers all ON, $100 floor. Both registries (/Users/bk/botctl/registry.json and /opt/botctl/registry.json) updated to describe two wallets.

## 7 Sep 2026: his fomo handle for the TRADING wallet is found
- On the fomo GASOLINU holders tab, the holder **"NotARandomUser"** shows 14.9M GASOLINU, $9,982.40 cost, avg entry $1M MC, 23h 50m avg hold. That is exactly the trading wallet's position (14,969,098 GASOLINU bought 5 Sep 23:22 for $9,983.63 plus five smaller clips). **So fomo.family/profile/NotARandomUser is the public face of 0xdce001e4ec11ab58650c51ae9658accbe0f49c48**, a second fomo account separate from his named @0xuberM profile. Use it to read his live theses and book without the wallet sweep.
- Also on that page: CoinGurruu (@CoinGurruu, 91,877 followers on X) holds $3,023 of GASOLINU at a $823k entry and wrote "Top pair for USO Gasolinu." CoinGurruu is the caller who put Uber into it; his 5 Sep 20:30 to 23:30 buy wave is Uber's entry window.
- GASOLINU screen itself is in [[screen-log-3]] and the artifact "GASOLINU Deep Dive". Uber is -38% on it at the time of the screen and it is roughly 1.5% of his book, not "one of his biggest" by dollars ($16,188 in, ~$10k now); it is one of his biggest by supply share (1.50% of the coin).

## 18 Sep 2026 — FOURTH WALLET FOUND, from a podcast: ESRw48XxyqDoEhDFCAqsJ6qGzXR4qWWWBKpzi3hhMBvp

- [stated] Ben: "find UMs wallet... he seems to have another one where he said he top blasted PAID in this podcast. it's not in the wallet we have." He supplied https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1XxygwEPLbNGM
- **THE WALLET: `ESRw48XxyqDoEhDFCAqsJ6qGzXR4qWWWBKpzi3hhMBvp`** (Solana). gmgn tag `fomo` and nothing else: no bundler, no sniper, no bot. Created 29 Aug 2026, 35 coins, 26% win rate, SOL balance 0.

### The method, and it is now the best one in the file: TRANSCRIBE THE AUDIO
- yt-dlp downloads an X broadcast fine (`yt-dlp -f replay-600 <broadcast url>`), ffmpeg strips it to 16kHz mono mp3, and **faster-whisper `base.en` transcribed 91 minutes in about 80 seconds on Ben's Mac**. `python3 -m pip install --user faster-whisper` (no `--break-system-packages` on the Mac's 3.9). Then regex the segments for the keywords instead of reading the transcript.
- Broadcast: "Flow State Episode 6: HYPE ATH, COMPLEX PULLBACKS, UM MODE", host Leo, started **18 Sep 16:00 UTC (23:00 Bangkok)**.
- Scripts kept: /tmp/bc/tx.py (transcribe + keyword hits), /tmp/paid/hunt.py (six-figure buyers), /tmp/paid/unique.py (uniqueness test).

### The four dated matches
1. **PAID.** At 27m09s he says he "top blasted six figures into [PAID] today" and later "I'm not going to re-blast or re-enter the trade". The wallet put **$117,083** into PAID (mint `98kfF7rmsg1QDUEoCqNE7g7M1FdrTt92TEp2CLzypump`), first buy 18 Sep 01:32 UTC, **fully exited 18 Sep 15:50 UTC for +$56,798 — ten minutes before the broadcast started.** Six figures, today, and already out, exactly as described.
2. **STONK $323,406.** He names pawns/PONS, STONK and PAID as a "trifecta of token factories", and at 26m43s says he regrets selling his stonk. The wallet sold out of STONK on 17 Sep 16:44, the day before.
3. **USELESS $205,993.** At 13m11s: "useless is a beautiful chart."
4. **ALLINU $70,037, bought 18 Sep 16:02 UTC** — two minutes after the broadcast began.

### Uniqueness
- Pulled every PAID trader gmgn exposes (121 wallets, four sort orders), took the 22 that put $80k+ in, and tested each for STONK and USELESS at size. **ESRw48 is the only one carrying both.** The next best were trivial ($5,630 and $1,498). Most of the other six-figure buyers are tagged bundler or sandwich_bot.
- ## ⛔ RETRACTED 19 Sep 2026. ESRw48 IS NOT HIS WALLET.
- **THE KILLER, from the same podcast Ben told me to mine harder: he says he wrote his STONK thesis when STONK was at a $2M market cap, held "more than 1% at the time", and that it did nothing for over a month so he "ran myself out of a good chunk of my position". STONK is now $203M.**
- **ESRw48 first bought the real stonk.fun STONK (`6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx`) on 17 SEPTEMBER 07:23 UTC, near the top, $323,406 in for a $1,102 profit. The wallet did not exist until 29 Aug.** It cannot be the wallet that held 1% at $2M. It is the opposite trade.
- Supporting mismatch: it also put $205,993 into USELESS for +$1,725. That is a late, high-turnover chaser. uberM describes himself repeatedly as "too early, too strong" and "I tend to be a little bit too early to these things". Wrong profile entirely.
- **ALSO A TICKER TRAP I nearly published: ESRw48 holds TWO tokens called STONK.** `6gMaZHGECM8sg2561eZhCJh26Wzagqbpe38q4hwb6x7i` is a different coin from the real stonk.fun `6GmAFSYs4gk3...`, and the addresses differ only by case in the first characters. **Always match the MINT, never the symbol.**
- Ben's own objection was right, though for a softer reason than this one: he said uberM would not shill a coin he had already sold. The transcript actually shows uberM disclosing the exit, so that specific argument does not hold, but his conclusion did.
- Old grade, kept for the record: **DOWNGRADED 19 Sep after Ben pushed back. BEST CANDIDATE, NOT STRONG, and one test short of settled.** I called it STRONG and should not have: the identifying test that worked for every previous uberM wallet, naming its fomo handle, has NOT been passed here.
- WHAT WOULD SETTLE IT, and it is a lookup not a guess: ESRw48 still holds **1,054,932 ALLINU (about $17,100)** plus $63,354 USDC. Find the ALLINU holder on fomo with a ~1.05M position and that handle is the owner. The list is 6,460 rows and the position sits far below the top 40, so it needs paging or a size filter, not the first screen.
- HONEST EVIDENCE AGAINST, recorded so it is weighed next time: its STONK ($323,406 in, +$1,102) and USELESS ($205,993 in, +$1,725) are near-flat high-turnover positions, whereas the known TRADING account's STONK closed +$57,478 on $28,814. Different style. 35 coins since 29 Aug, 26% win rate.
- RULED OUT while hunting: `498g1rVnFcnjBjpfw1xyqA1WvgQXUU8RWuELjxkjAayQ` is **frankdegods** (gmgn carries the twitter handle on portfolio stats: `common.twitter_username`). **Check that field FIRST on any candidate, it names the owner outright and costs one call.**
- CAUTION on the phrase: "top blasting" is common fomo slang, not an uberM fingerprint. An ALLINU thesis by StonkyScheffler uses it unprompted. The TRADE is evidence; the phrase is not.

### ⚠ A TRAP I FELL INTO AND MUST NOT REPEAT: "Friends only" only covers who BEN follows
- I first checked PAID's holders on fomo with the **Friends only** filter and concluded he did not hold it. That filter only shows accounts **Ben follows**. Ben follows @0xuberM but **does NOT follow @NotARandomUser** (his profile shows Follow, not Following). So the filter could never have surfaced the trading account. **Before trusting a Friends-only answer, confirm Ben actually follows that handle.**
- Second trap, same session: fomo's right-hand rail is headed "Your positions" and shows **Ben's own book**, not the profile being viewed. The PAID $6,245 / 192.5K PAID I saw there is **Ben's own position**, not uberM's. The profile's own holdings are the CENTRE panel.
- Also confirmed while there: the trading account's last ~18h of swaps contain no PAID at all, and PAID is absent from its 94 open positions. That is what proves the trade happened somewhere else.

## 19 Sep 2026 — THE STONK STORY BELONGS TO THE WALLET WE ALREADY HAVE. Proof-grade.

Ben told me to mine the podcast for the STONK detail. It did not find a new wallet. It **proved the old one**, and it is the strongest confirmation in this whole file that `NotARandomUser` = `0xdce001e4ec11ab58650c51ae9658accbe0f49c48`.

### His podcast claim, and the closed trade sitting on that account
| he said (18 Sep broadcast) | NotARandomUser's closed STONK trade |
|---|---|
| wrote the thesis at "$2 million market cap" | **avg entry $1.4M MC** |
| "had more than 1% at the time" | $28,814.44 in at $1.4M MC = **2.06% of supply** |
| it did nothing for a month so "I ran myself out of a good chunk of my position" | avg exit **$4.4M MC**, 58 transactions, sells clustered 8-12 Aug at $8-12M |
| result, in his telling, a fraction of what it should have been | **+$57,478.37, +199.48%**, while STONK is now **$201M** |

- Had he held the 2.06%, it would be worth about **$4.1 million** today. That gap IS the story he tells.
- **The thesis text on that account matches the podcast almost word for word.** Posted there a month ago: "Over $300k rev in a few days. Over 5% of supply burned. Over $1.5m in rewards distributed. Multiple runners above $1m mcap. Reviving Raydium. Stock pairs will only become more popular. Mispriced." In the broadcast he narrates the same reasoning: he read the docs, saw it auto-claims 60% of trading fees to buy and burn STONK, and called it mispriced with the only bear case being "Solana doesn't care".

### Two things Ben misremembered from the audio, corrected
- **"Two mil" is the MARKET CAP he entered at, not a profit.** The line is "I wrote a full thesis when this was like two mil". There is no $2M profit claim.
- **He never says $250,000.** The real figure is **$57,478**. The "quarter of a mill" in the audio is about PAID's buyback ("it already bought back over a quarter of a mill in four days"), a different subject entirely.

### Where this leaves the hunt
- **STONK: solved, no new wallet.** AI: also points at the known wallet, which bought AI nineteen minutes after its pool opened, earlier than the $3-5M mcap people credit him with.
- **PAID: still unexplained.** Not in the known account's open book, and not found in a scan of its recent closed positions back through the 18 Sep window. ESRw48 stays RETRACTED.
- **METHOD NOTE, the cheap one I should have used first: fomo's closed-position detail gives AVG ENTRY MARKET CAP and AVG EXIT.** Open the profile, Closed tab, click the row. That single number tests any "I was in at X" claim instantly. Sorting the closed list by Recent instead of Top trades is how you find a trade that was flat or small.

## 19 Sep 2026 — Ben supplies the two screenshots that settle PAID and open the real trail

- [stated] Ben opened the PAID trade on NotARandomUser himself. **PAID, CLOSED: $24,270.62 invested, 7 transactions, avg entry $22.7M MC, avg exit $22.7M MC, minus $43.40 (-0.18%).** Five figures, and dead flat.
- **So his fomo account DID trade PAID, and it is definitively NOT the trade he describes on the podcast.** He said six figures, top blasted, today. This is $24k, round-tripped at the same market cap. Ben is right that another wallet holds the real trade. My scan of the recent closed list missed this row because it is a loser and I was reading a profit-sorted list.
- **THE TRAIL BEN SPOTTED: the STONK trade's transaction list contains a `Sent` row — $23,421.14 of STONK at an $8.9M market cap, 12 Aug 12:37 AM, alongside the sells.** At $8.9M mcap on 836,267,846 supply that is $0.010643 a token, so **about 2,200,000 STONK left his fomo account to an address he controls.** This is the Solana equivalent of the 10,000,000 FIRE transfer that exposed the SIDE wallet on Robinhood Chain.
- NOTE on the small `Received` rows in the same list ($4.19, $5.24, $4.64, $5.46, $4.80, $8.74 at $6.6-8.3M MC): those are **stonk.fun holder fee distributions, not a wallet funding him.** Do not read them as an inbound transfer from another wallet.
- TESTED AND FAILED: cross-checked every six-figure PAID buyer I had pulled for a STONK `history_transfer_in` near 2.2M. **No match.** Closest were 2,497 / 357 / 107 tokens, and one router-shaped wallet (`ASTyfSima4LLAdDgoFGkgqoKowG1LZFDr9fAQrg7iaJZ`, 66.5M STONK in over 7,190 transfer-ins, which is an aggregator, not a person).
- **WHY THAT TEST WAS TOO NARROW, and it is the lesson: gmgn's `token traders` returns only ~100 rows per sort order, skewed to profit and balance extremes.** A wallet that put six figures in and exited flat sits in neither tail. The PAID candidate pool I built was never the full set of six-figure buyers.
- **THE NEXT STEP THAT ACTUALLY RESOLVES IT: trace the 2.2M STONK transfer on chain directly.** Find the Solana transaction moving ~2,200,000 STONK on 12 Aug around 00:37, read the destination, and that is his other wallet. Helius key on file in [[uberm-wallets]]. That is a transfer lookup, not a holder-set intersection, so it cannot be defeated by the trader-list cap.

## 19 Sep 2026 — PAID SOLVED. FIFTH WALLET, ON CHAIN, WITH A DIRECT TRANSFER LINK: `2Rd2Rm17UGzhJXnbEBrHyvhsghyDvuwCpNDioeNQWGGZ`

- [stated] Ben set the method: take the stream's date, his US timezone, the word "today", find the six-figure PAID buys in that window, then match his other coins. That is exactly what closed it.
- **His public fomo account (NotARandomUser) has a real on-chain Solana wallet: `2L17Sw85Lh2Ca7ejEzWqyJsZ3yS4DxQhYr52X5H5xRns`** (gmgn tag `fomo`, created 5 Jan). Found by exact amount match to the fomo book: Pigeon 10,273,277.62 and Speed 16,642,927.63. The `userAddress` fomo prints (`AS1QtopRPiqTVLnrLm2tyuFuqHz5BuAd29SbGy3aYTUD`) is an internal key with ZERO on-chain existence; never look it up on chain.
- **2L17Sw85 sent positions straight to 2Rd2Rm17:** ANSEM $186,388 (6 Sep), fone $62,758 (30 Aug), OTC $9,642 (5 Sep), Qenis (14 Aug). That is the link, same shape as the 10M FIRE transfer that exposed SIDE.
- **The PAID trade on 2Rd2Rm17 (Bangkok):** bought ~$108k in 50 clips 18 Sep 22:05-22:51. PAID's ATH ($37.8M) was 22:11. Stream started 23:00; "top blasted six figures into PAID today" at 23:27. Sold $22k 19 Sep 02:19-02:25, replied "i'm in that" ~02:30, dumped the last $76k 04:57-05:00. Now holds 0, about $10k loss. Its 6 Sep 15:20 STONK mass sell matches his 6 Sep "rugged myself out of stonk" post. Also traded Jimothy $90k, KINS, SQUIRE, ORE, neet, FARM.
- **"Traded this coin earlier, didn't think much of it" = the public wallet's PAID: ~$24k in and out 16-17 Sep.** Matches the fomo closed row Ben found.
- Wallet 2Rd2Rm17: created 21 Mar 2026, gmgn tag `arbitrager` (noise, it just collects spam airdrops), self-custody, not a fomo account.

### Retracted this session
- "The hidden wallet is another fomo account" was WRONG. fomo transfer records showed $130k USDC withdrawn 16-18 Sep to `4HqkiYqqYJQ8Ue1vcsx3hm3XW8tjeTCuEuFg2m9RYncN` ($100k) and `CQozJjEpLUxoErEpHRrtfwXBSKRabfaR1kV2mx6oTNcS` ($30k, also got the 2.2M STONK on 11 Aug 17:37 UTC). Both are fomo-internal keys with no on-chain existence, like AS1Qtop. They are fomo routing ids, not wallets. Do not chase them on chain.
- `AhemgmnNuLAVcAfMzVxbecmdNWKBtoLBkKAKSxDYW6Hr` (only six-figure Sep 18 buyer in the top-547 that still held) is NOT him, it is a churner. `C4DKn6oq…` is fomo user Milliardi. `5uxLEtZz…`, `ATQQzRyh…` are LP/arb wallets with coincidental STONK numbers.

### Methods that worked, keep
- **fomo user ↔ on-chain wallet: match exact token amounts.** fomo's `POST /hodlers/top` (token page, Holders tab) returns handle + humanAmount; gmgn `token holders` balance equals it to the token. 39 of 44 public PAID holders matched this way. Public fomo accounts ARE individually visible on gmgn.
- **fomo API from the browser** (needs the page's own auth header, captured by hooking XMLHttpRequest, never printed): `GET /trades/{tradeId}` gives `swaps` and `transfers` with real `toAddress`; `GET /v2/users/{uuid}/transfers` gives every deposit/withdrawal; `GET /trades?userId=&status=open&limit=25` gives the open book with exact amounts. `userId` is a UUIDv5 fomo derives server-side, no address→user lookup exists.
- Broadcast timing via `yt-dlp --dump-single-json` (release_timestamp). Convert to Bangkok before reasoning about "today".
- Ben's timing method beats holder-set intersections: build the buy window from the stream time, pull `portfolio activity --type buy` per candidate, then confirm ownership by a transfer link, never by profit-size coincidence.
- gmgn `token holders` order_by accepts only amount_percentage / profit / unrealized_profit / buy_volume_cur / sell_volume_cur; `usd_value` and `balance` return 400 (that silently emptied two of my early pulls).
- Ben was asked whether to add 2Rd2Rm17 to the 0XUBERM ALERT bot; no answer yet.
FINAL WRITE