---
name: uberm-wallets
description: Wallet identification for @0xuberM (fomo, 36k followers) — his real Robinhood Chain wallet, the undisclosed second wallet that sold FIRE ahead of his public sale, and the fomo/Relay plumbing that makes RH-chain wallet screens misread. Read alongside [[copytrade-targets]].
sources: [cowork]
aliases: [0xuberM, uberM, fomo-relay-plumbing]
---

# @0xuberM wallet hunt, 30 Aug 2026

- [stated] Ben asked to find 0xuberM's wallets on Robinhood Chain and test whether he front-runs his fomo-visible wallet with another one. Called him "a beast on chain"
- Artifact: https://claude.ai/code/artifact/ceb36d4c-b153-4aa2-9eb2-eb80ba08eac9

## The wallets
- REAL RH-chain wallet: **0xcf6cdf01acb524d8e53d1d13b1a89fcadbd7034c** — EIP-7702 delegated EOA, holds 13,215,015.11 FIRE which matches his fomo-displayed 13.2M exactly. That balance match is the identification. 130 transfer legs, 20 tokens, first activity 9 Jul 2026
- UNDISCLOSED second wallet: **0xc3a76958cb75bd3070462515916fa6ff2564c405** — same 7702 wallet type, first event 23 Aug 22:13, received 10,000,000 FIRE from the main wallet at 22:16, holds 7,900,186 FIRE ($29,278). Never bought anything, ever
- Solana trading wallet (where he actually trades): **FM54z6w7zS64V7MMaWfaDDkZKbFZQbDntULPxnGnZcoZ**
- INERT decoys, both from his fomo profile record: evmAddress 0x2f46ee31ccb15aeecc9e27f56fcd0310d125f6d3 (1 leg ever) and Solana C3fSePYEQgwiZ85ZPxy4hccjM4tX8bJDW4ADS6u3GQen. His fomo SWAP records stamp a third EVM address, 0xf02bae1a6e11bf45cd04a4ac0fced35b63ea08d2, nonce 0 and zero transfers ever. Screening any declared fomo address finds an empty wallet

## The finding
- His main wallet has made exactly ONE transfer to a non-router address in its life: 10,000,000 FIRE on 23 Aug 22:16 to a wallet created three minutes earlier, at $1,845,884 mcap ($18,459 of value walking off the profile with no sell recorded)
- That wallet sold 1,098,853 FIRE on 29 Aug 05:56 ($2.16M mcap, $2,376) and 1,000,961 on 29 Aug 06:27 ($2.57M mcap, $2,568). His PUBLIC fomo sale of 777,355 FIRE came 14 hours later at 20:18, $3.73M mcap, $2,897. Hidden size is 2.7x the public sale
- IMPORTANT: the hidden sells were at LOWER prices than the public one, so this is NOT profitable front-running. It is undisclosed distribution. His followers saw one small sale into strength; the chain shows he had been selling since $2.16M
- COMMON CONTROL IS PROBABLE, NOT PROVEN. For: address created 3 min before, never bought anything, only inbound value is his FIRE, identical 7702 type, and his wallet has sent to no other non-router address ever. Against: 0x62cfc82b6dea627d75d63feb47db18fcfea18df4 (a real active RH trader, 1,100 legs since 1 Jul, holds 12,000,000 "worth" plus JUGGERNAUT/CASHCAT/TENDIES) sent it 50,000 "worth" three minutes BEFORE the FIRE, so someone else knew the address. Alternative reading is an OTC sale to a buyer who spun up a fresh wallet. Unresolvable from calldata: Relay encodes the cross-chain destination off chain, and fomo has no public address-to-account lookup (/v2/users/address/{addr} 404s for every address including his known one)
- HIS HEADLINE FIRE GAIN IS MOSTLY AN AIRDROP. 16,604,113 FIRE (69.2%) arrived free on 18 Jul 18:27 in a single 50-recipient multisend signed by the fomo relayer. He only ever BOUGHT 7,388,255 FIRE for about $3,071 (four clips, $339.6K to $700.4K mcap). fomo prices zero-cost inventory as pure profit, which is where the +2,059% on his profile comes from. The bought portion is a genuine ~6x
- HE IS NOT AN RH-CHAIN TRADER. Of his last 100 fomo swaps: 72 Solana, 26 Robinhood Chain, 1 Ethereum, 1 Base. His whole RH wallet is one memecoin (FIRE) plus tokenised-stock dust (GME, NVDA, TSLA, AAPL, SPY, AMD). His $248,240 book and top-5 trades are Solana: STONK $122,689 (+79%), ANSEM $76,371 (+51%)

## Solana check, 30 Aug — his Solana side is NOT followable either
- [stated] Ben's read: "this guy doesn't trade on chain outside of his fomo account, at least not to the degree where it makes sense to follow that." Right about Robinhood Chain, wrong that everything is inside fomo (the 10M FIRE move is outside it), and Solana turned out to be unfollowable for a different reason
- BOTH his Solana addresses (FM54z6w7zS64V7MMaWfaDDkZKbFZQbDntULPxnGnZcoZ and C3fSePYEQgwiZ85ZPxy4hccjM4tX8bJDW4ADS6u3GQen) have ZERO SOL, ZERO token accounts and ZERO signatures ever. They have never existed on chain
- SYSTEMIC, not personal: checked three other fomo users' published Solana and EVM addresses (from his friendsFollowing list). All six are empty, nonce 0. **Every address fomo publishes on a profile is a label, not a wallet.** The real wallet is only findable by tracing a swap's token flow, as done on RH chain
- Could not locate a Solana self-custody wallet for him by balance matching: pulled all 13,775 STONK holders (mint 6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx, 6 dec) and all 79,670 ANSEM holders (9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump). 78 owners hold his displayed 5.15-5.65M STONK band; NONE holds 210-245k ANSEM. So his displayed Solana book is not in one self-custody wallet. Points to a custodial/omnibus model on fomo's Solana leg
- Helius getTokenAccounts params must be an OBJECT not an array, or it returns "invalid type: map, expected a string". Working key 4c494046-6535-491e-9b48-9bbf9199bfaf
- Solana pool signature scanning is impractical for tracing a specific fomo swap: the top STONK Meteora pool 48M3tRdbVYmEbf5rCTFVAgqCCaZdChVmeg3VPBrmgT8m burns 1,000 signatures in 16 minutes
- PRACTICAL VERDICT: you cannot put a wallet tracker on 0xuberM. The only two addresses worth watching are his RH-chain pair, and his RH book is one memecoin

## fomo plumbing — reusable, and it corrects earlier work
- fomo API, readable from a logged-in browser session on his Mac: /v2/users/userHandle/{handle} returns the profile INCLUDING address and evmAddress plus the user UUID; then /v2/users/{uuid}/swaps, /balances, /spotlight, and /v2/transfers/with/{uuid}. Swap objects carry networkId, inTokenAddress, outTokenAddress, human USD amounts, provider and the executing address
- HOW TO READ IT: the app wraps fetch in fomoFetch and adds an Authorization header, so a direct fetch fails. Hook window.fetch to clone responses, then drive the SPA with history.pushState + a popstate event to trigger the calls. Reuse the captured init.headers to replay authenticated GETs. Swaps paginate but limit/offset/page/cursor are all ignored — 100 rows is what you get without finding the real cursor
- RH-chain trades placed through fomo run through provider RELAY and settle to Solana USDC, so a "Robinhood Chain" fomo trade has no ERC-20 quote leg on RH chain
- **CORRECTION to the nine-token sub-$1M screen** ([[rh-early-cohort-overlap]]): 0xb92fe925dc43a0ecde6c8b1a2709c170ec4fff4f, which that study flagged as an airdrop push-source spanning 8 tokens, is the fomo/Relay SETTLEMENT contract. On a fomo trade the tx is signed by a relayer, not the buyer, so the signed-buy filter classified genuine fomo purchases as airdrops and silently excluded every fomo user from that screen. The filter is still correct about real multisend farms. Fomo accounts need their own rule: settlement through 0xb92fe925 into a 7702 wallet is a buy. Routing chain for a fomo RH buy is pool -> 0x1d4b86491ec211257cbedd77a4380a7494624eff or 0x39b38686a19836ac10162c490e4558e120cbbe5f -> 0xb92fe925 -> user wallet
- 0xacc79e7b9f8dbb22e197c76d92ff8c0472ac81b4 (EOA, nonce 114,696) is the fomo bundler/relayer. It signs most 7702-wallet txs AND distributes the tokenised-stock dust drip that many RH wallets receive, so a shared drip cadence is NOT evidence of common ownership
- METHOD THAT IDENTIFIES ANY FOMO USER'S REAL WALLET: take a swap from their public feed with an exact token amount and timestamp, eth_getLogs that token around the block, match the amount, and follow the transfer chain to the final recipient. Then confirm with balanceOf against the balance their profile displays

## Re-hunt 6 Sep 2026 — the coins-plus-dates method, and what it proved

- [stated] Ben asked to find the wallets again from a different angle: his X account is private but Ben follows him, and "he gives a lot of coins, so that should give a lot of information combined with the date". Coins named in the screenshots: AI, Boner, Moo, iCoin, Spacehood, AMC (6 Sep), CASHCAT (27 Jul), Stonk/Stonkbrokers (10 Aug), FWA (14 Aug)
- MAIN WALLET RE-CONFIRMED AND STILL CURRENT. Read his live fomo profile (fomo.family/profile/0xuberM) and matched it to chain: fomo shows FIRE 12.4M ($20,323.05) and AMC 15.70; 0xcf6cdf01acb524d8e53d1d13b1a89fcadbd7034c holds 12,471,299.50 FIRE and 15.70 AMC. Exact match on two independent balances
- He has SOLD about 744,000 FIRE since 30 Aug (13,215,015 -> 12,471,299). Second wallet 0xc3a76958cb75bd3070462515916fa6ff2564c405 unchanged at 7,900,186.28 FIRE
- **NO THIRD WALLET EXISTS THAT IS REACHABLE FROM HIS.** Full tokentx on the main wallet, 416 legs from 9 Jul to 6 Sep: every outbound leg goes to the fomo/Relay settlement contract 0xb92fe925dc43a0ecde6c8b1a2709c170ec4fff4f except ONE, the 10,000,000 FIRE to 0xc3a76958 on 23 Aug. Nothing new since. He has never funded a self-custody wallet from his RH wallet
- **HE DOES NOT HOLD THE COINS HE POSTS ABOUT.** His entire fomo book is $21,558: FIRE, SOL, NVDA, AMC, GLD, GME, UNITY. No AI, BONER, MOO, ICOIN, SPACEHOOD, CASHCAT or STONKBROKERS anywhere, on fomo or in either wallet (checked by balanceOf against all of them). The 6 Sep coin list is talk, not position
- THE INTERSECTION METHOD WORKS BUT NEEDS THE FOMO CROSS-CHECK. Pulled the top-1250 holders of ICOIN and SPACEHOOD (the two smallest coins he named), intersected to 66 wallets, then scored those on AI/BONER/MOO/CASHCAT/AMC/FIRE. Exactly ONE scored 5 of 8: 0xf38d0e00dfbaa70399d95d9a4ed4c839a297223b, a 7702 fomo wallet holding AI, BONER, MOO, AMC, FIRE on top of ICOIN and SPACEHOOD. It is NOT him: his fomo book has none of those. It is a different active fomo trader (589 legs since 29 Aug, all through 0xb92fe925). **An active fomo trader holds the whole trending basket, so a basket match alone identifies "an active trader", not a person.** Always disprove against the fomo profile before naming anyone
- HIS REAL ACTIVITY IS SOLANA AND HE IS DISTRIBUTING STONK. From the live swap feed: bought STONK in $4,336-5,631 clips at $7.2-8.2M mcap (2-3 weeks ago), then sold $18,867 at $4.9M, and $4,939 + $5,043 + $9,992 + $4,952 at $18.7-25.6M, then $22,689 at $18M, $35,880 at $15.7M and $34,462 at $15.1M in the last 4-6 days. About $93k of STONK sold into the last week. His public 10 Aug post was "Stonk token just retardedly mispriced". Same shape as the FIRE episode: public bullishness, undisclosed exit
- Other recent Solana swaps: ANSEM bought 3 x $24,987 at $205-208M then sold $8,315 at $332.6M; JIMOTHY bought $2,385 + $7,996 + $6,996 + $6,996 at $12-12.8M; SQUIRE bought $11,000 at $2M and sold $8,850 at $1.6M; TOKABU bought $5,457 at $2.7M
- fomo profile now reads: 38,362 followers, 1.8K trades, 4d 21h average hold, top five trades +$95,195.73, +$63,001.65, +$58,666.92, +$52,668.68, +$49,540.84
- METHOD NOTE: fomo.family/r/{handle} is a REFERRAL link and redirects to the landing page. The profile is fomo.family/profile/{handle} and renders holdings, all swaps with USD size and market cap, and the trade leaderboard as plain text, with no API hooking needed. Read it with get_page_text; it is far cheaper than scraping X
- METHOD NOTE: X blocks scripted scrolling on the timeline (window.scrollBy does nothing past the first screen), so harvesting his post history that way does not work. The fomo swap feed carries the same information with exact sizes and timestamps

## 6 Sep 2026, second pass — THE SAME ADDRESS ON OTHER CHAINS. This is the unlock.

- [stated] Ben supplied dated screenshots: 5 Aug "Ticker AI on Robinhood chain still a spot" (70K views), 25 Aug "It's a Shiba Inu Cyborg. The ticker is AI. It's paired to Nvidia", 27 Aug "Reflexivity.exe" over the STONK buyback dashboard, 1 Sep "a dog, a cow, a hoodie and a dream" (AI, MOO, SPACEHOOD), 3 Sep "I bought a coin on Ethereum today" and refused to name it
- **METHOD THAT CRACKED IT: check the same address on every EVM chain.** A fomo embedded wallet is one key, so the address is identical on Robinhood Chain, Ethereum, Base and BNB, and it only "appears" on a chain when it first transacts there. Nonces: main = 1 eth / 5 base / 2 bnb, second = 5 eth / 6 base. Two calls, and it doubled the map. Do this FIRST on any future wallet hunt
- **CORRECTION to the 30 Aug entry.** 0xc3a76958cb75bd3070462515916fa6ff2564c405 was NOT "created three minutes earlier". It was created three minutes earlier ON ROBINHOOD CHAIN ONLY. The address has traded on Base since 24 Nov 2025 (360 legs) and on Ethereum since 25 Apr 2026. A first-seen timestamp is per chain and means nothing on its own. The misleading number was the RH-chain first-event time

## The 3 Sep Ethereum coin, and a THIRD wallet, proven

- THE COIN IS **IMD / Identity.md, 0xd34a99bc0f67ae1bbd63c660e6d0b0dd03e263b7 on Ethereum**. Pair created 29 Jul 2026, now $2.52, $8.33M mcap, $1.35M liquidity
- The flow on 2 Sep 2026: 16:25 wallet 0xc3a76958cb75bd3070462515916fa6ff2564c405 receives 4,231.7479 IMD from the fomo settlement contract 0xb92fe925dc43a0ecde6c8b1a2709c170ec4fff4f (a fomo buy). 17:03 it forwards all 4,231.7479 IMD to 0x27491ec5c75b7090051c395ac20e0412b40ca57d. 17:04 it sends that same address 0.01 ETH for gas. 17:55 that address approves the token and stakes into StakedIMD 0x9efa934d9fad4ae28c998a40195646b965a97247, receiving 535.4465 sIMD
- **THIRD WALLET: 0x27491ec5c75b7090051c395ac20e0412b40ca57d**, self-custody, first activity 2 Sep 2026, three native txs and three token legs in its entire life. COMMON CONTROL IS PROVEN HERE, not inferred: the same wallet supplied both the tokens and the gas one minute apart, and the receiving address has never done anything else
- **HIS POSITION IS INVISIBLE TO A BALANCE CHECK.** Its IMD balanceOf is ZERO because the whole lot is staked. Only sIMD 535.4465 shows. This is the exact trap the forensics skill lists: an exit is balanceOf PLUS staking PLUS pending, never balanceOf alone. About $10,664 at today's price
- HE TEASED IT PUBLICLY AND NEVER NAMED IT. 3 Sep 01:07, 16K views, 39 replies, "tf is the point of telling us if you not gonna say what it is ESPECIALLY after buying it already". He had bought it about nine hours before the post and staked it 30 minutes after buying

## What the other chains say about how he actually operates

- BASE MAIN 0xcf6cdf01acb524d8e53d1d13b1a89fcadbd7034c has 1,988 token legs from 4 Oct 2025 to 4 Sep 2026, but since 1 Aug 2026 it is almost entirely a FUNDING RAIL, not trading: USDC arrives from 0xf70da97812cb96acdf810712aa562db8dfa3dbef and leaves in the same second to 0x4cd00e387622c35bddb9b4c962c136462338bc31, which Blockscout names **RelayDepository**. Clips of $5,437 (3 Sep), $2,550 (4 Sep), $1,633, $1,469, $1,443, $602, $465. Everything else arriving there in tiny round lots (25, 50, 500 units of USER, VORF, UXOR, UNOS, USOF and similar) is airdrop spam, not buys
- Its real Base trading was Oct to Dec 2025: DCA, "proof of work", CYPR, all against 0xf5042e6ffac5a625d4e7848e0b01373d8eb9e222
- ETHEREUM MAIN is old fomo activity only: DRAGON 15-16 May, BAGELS 16 May, ASTEROID 18 Jun, each bought from and sold back to 0xb92fe925. Current holdings are dust plus 7,666,666,667 UNITY

## The negative result that still matters

- **He does not hold the Robinhood Chain coins he posts about.** Checked by balanceOf on all three wallets and against his live fomo book: no AI, BONER, MOO, ICOIN, SPACEHOOD, CASHCAT or STONKBROKERS anywhere. The 5 Aug "ticker AI still a spot" at 70K views, the 25 Aug Shiba Inu Cyborg post at 31K views and the 1 Sep "a dog, a cow, a hoodie and a dream" at 30K views are all coins he has never owned on chain
- So the pattern across three episodes is consistent: **the loud public calls are coins he does not hold, and the coins he does hold he either does not name (IMD) or names only while leaving (STONK, FIRE)**

## 6 Sep 2026, third pass — he CLAIMS the three coins, and no wallet of his holds them

- [stated] Ben sent screenshots where uberM says, 5-6 Sep: "+100m on $moo will come quick once it breaks out previous ath" (8.2K views), "This is my first ticker shill on TL since AI", "I like Net", and answering @zerothekidxo: "**My 3 LONG tokens currently are AI, Moo and iCoin**". @DegenToDisciple then asks "No more space hood?"
- CHECKED HIS WHOLE FOMO BOOK, DUST INCLUDED. Clicked every "Show dust" toggle: 19 positions, not 8. FIRE 12.4M ($20,323.05), SOL 2.83, FIRE 20.1M, NVDA, AMC, GLD, GME, UNITY, GMERALD, ANSUM, 1Piece, CUP, CAT, Joker, DIH, KING, DOG, FIRE dust x2. **No AI, no MOO, no ICOIN anywhere.** Same answer from balanceOf on both fomo wallets
- **HIS ENTIRE VISIBLE BOOK IS $21,558 AND $743.50 CASH**, down from the $248,240 recorded on 30 Aug. He has sold roughly 94% of it, STONK included, in the same week he posted "+100m on $moo will come quick". Whatever he is doing, he is not doing it with a visible balance sheet
- HUNTED THE UNLINKED WALLET AND DID NOT FIND IT. Steps: pulled top holders of MOO (200), AI (1,298) and ICOIN (1,250); intersected to 13 wallets holding all three with real size; typed each with eth_getCode; dropped the ones still holding SPACEHOOD (he has exited it). Then checked every native value transfer OUT of both his wallets on Robinhood Chain, Base and Ethereum, looking for the 0.01 ETH gas-funding fingerprint that exposed the IMD wallet. Only two exist: 0x27491ec5c75b7090051c395ac20e0412b40ca57d (the IMD staker, already known) and **0xb3a020f935f29d80aa0872d6229ad2c08dd6a912**, an EOA that holds $3,531 USDC on Base, nothing on Robinhood Chain, and has never touched AI, MOO or ICOIN
- SO THE POSITION IS EITHER BRIDGED IN WITH NO EVM TRAIL, OR IT DOES NOT EXIST. Both his known self-custody wallets were funded with gas from his fomo wallet, which is how they were found. A wallet funded from an exchange or from Solana would leave no link and cannot be found by traversal, only by behaviour
- BEST CANDIDATES FROM THE INTERSECTION, none provably his, all worth watching in their own right (they hold exactly what he says he holds):
  - **0xa37cd19f9a6fdcc323ba42fa498807b4212222f3** — 7702, $1,312,382 across AI ($1,075,874) MOO ($171,701) ICOIN ($64,806) and NOTHING else from the basket. 1,472 legs since 4 Aug, heavy tokenised-stock trader (SPY, GME, RDDT, MSTR, MRVL, INDA) plus QUOTRON, CINEMA, RAM, WALL. AI first buy 20 Aug (AFTER his 5 Aug call, so not a front-runner), MOO first buy 31 Aug, ICOIN first buy 31 Aug, never held SPACEHOOD
  - 0xdce001e4ec11ab58650c51ae9658accbe0f49c48 — 7702, $477,811, no SPACEHOOD
  - 0x12f48f152cbf53657a80be044de77d71b3d8643a — EOA, $111,141, holds only the three
  - 0x9563cefc253b87773786f439589cf96b333526e8 — 7702, $97,517, no SPACEHOOD
  - 0xc1cd68d76dcf4244ac37fad3011e5d5d6bb334fc — 7702, $88,141, holds only the three
- DEAD END, RECORDED SO IT IS NOT REPEATED: 0xf38d0e00dfbaa70399d95d9a4ed4c839a297223b holds the whole named basket but is NOT him. Positions are $143 to $1,255 each, it bought AI only on 30 Aug, and it is still ACCUMULATING SPACEHOOD (12 buys, zero sells, through 5 Sep) after he dropped it. A trending-basket match with trivial size is a fomo tourist, not a caller
- TRAP FOR NEXT TIME: Blockscout's tokentx silently returns an empty result set under rate pressure rather than erroring, so a wallet with 589 legs reads as "legs 0". Always re-run a zero-leg answer before concluding the wallet is empty, and cache the raw pull to a file the first time it succeeds

## 6 Sep 2026, settled — fomo's own holder list proves he holds none of it

- [stated] Ben passed 0x38c4d77938821037d3a42c7da0519ee5a9158cad and said "he might have bought this coin, it was shilled to him". That is ELON (Elon) on Robinhood Chain, Uniswap, paired to SPCX and TSLA, born 30 Aug 2026, about $91,823 mcap and $16,054 liquidity, 229 buys against 209 sells in 24h
- ELON is held by NEITHER of his fomo wallets, NOR the IMD staker, NOR the Base USDC wallet. Two of the thirteen AI+MOO+ICOIN wallets do hold it: 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951 (a CONTRACT, 194,413,531.81 ELON, about 19% of the whole supply, so a pool or vault, not a person) and 0xfd6e86cf9aeca787cffb198bca859d459a44a847 (7702, 13,832,252.54 ELON, about $1,270)
- **THE METHOD THAT FINALLY SETTLES IT: fomo's per-token Holders tab lists TRADER HANDLES with position, PnL, average entry and thesis, and it has a "Friends only" filter.** Ben follows uberM on fomo (his profile shows Following, 5 mutuals), so if uberM held a token it would appear under that filter. Checked AI: friends holding it are CoinGurruu ($482,822) and econoar ($207,772), no uberM. Checked MOO: cashmachine ($436,282), TizzWhisperer ($348,483), PaikCapital ($256,580), no uberM
- **CONCLUSION, from fomo's own data rather than inference: he does not hold AI and he does not hold MOO.** He posted "+100m on $moo will come quick" and "My 3 LONG tokens currently are AI, Moo and iCoin" while holding neither on the platform he trades on and neither in any wallet traceable to him
- USE THIS ROUTE FIRST NEXT TIME. fomo.family/tokens/{chain}/{ca} then the Holders tab plus "Friends only" answers "does this person hold this coin" in two clicks, for anyone Ben follows on fomo. It beats holder-set intersection, beats balance matching, and it cannot be defeated by an unlinked wallet as long as the person trades through fomo

## 6 Sep 2026, fourth pass — CORRECTING MYSELF, and the closed-trades tab

- [stated] Ben pushed back: "i am certain that he owns the coins he talks about at the time he does. he might sell them of course but he surely owned AI when he mentioned it". Correct challenge, and it exposed a real error in the previous pass
- **CORRECTION TO MY OWN CLAIM.** I wrote "he does not hold the coins he posts about" and "his book collapsed 94%". Both were read off the OPEN positions tab only. Fomo separates Open and Closed, and his Closed tab holds **987 positions**. The $21,558 open book is a snapshot between cycles, not his size. His top closed trades by profit: GAME $451,372.85 invested (+$95,195.73), MONEROCHAN $116,255.73 (+$63,001.65), unc $2,123.21 (+$58,666.92, +2,763%), Buttcoin $75,020.82 (+$52,668.68), STONK $87,287.04 (+$49,540.84), 67 $52,762.96 (+$46,782.32), ANSEM $105,786.89 (+$44,867.60), META $325,293.84 (+$40,237.70), CARDS $110,727.17 (+$35,654.58). This is a large, fast-cycling trader, not someone who is 94% out
- NODE-LEVEL PROOF, full history, not an explorer: eth_getLogs on each token filtered by Transfer topic and his address as recipient returns **ZERO inbound transfers of AI, MOO, ICOIN and SPACEHOOD for BOTH 0xcf6cdf01acb524d8e53d1d13b1a89fcadbd7034c and 0xc3a76958cb75bd3070462515916fa6ff2564c405, ever**. Neither wallet has ever touched those four tokens
- AI's pair was created **14 Jul 2026 17:48 UTC**. His "Ticker AI on Robinhood chain still a spot" post was 5 Aug, three weeks into its life, at $70K views. AI is now about $203M mcap
- THE STRONGEST INFERENCE AVAILABLE, and it is bounded evidence, not proof: his closed list is sorted by profit, and **AI does not appear anywhere in the top ~46 closed trades**. If he had bought AI before 5 Aug when it was "still a spot" and it later ran to $203M, that trade would rank first by a distance, ahead of GAME's +$95,195. It is not there
- SO EITHER he traded AI in a wallet with no link to the two known ones, or the AI position never existed in his fomo account. His known self-custody wallets were both found through gas funding from his fomo wallet; a wallet funded from an exchange or from Solana leaves no such trail
- WHAT I COULD NOT DO, recorded so it is not retried blindly: the 987-row closed list is virtualised and neither window scrolling nor inner-container scrolling enumerated it (X and fomo both stall scripted scrolling). The fomo swap feed caps at ~100 rows regardless of paging params, as already recorded. Replaying the app's captured Authorization header against /v2/users/... is blocked by policy and was not attempted further. **The remaining clean route is a human: open fomo.family/profile/0xuberM, click Closed, and look for AI, MOO and iCoin**

## 6 Sep 2026, FOUND IT — 0xdce001e4ec11ab58650c51ae9658accbe0f49c48

- [stated] Ben checked the Closed tab himself, saw no AI, and said "He, for sure, has a different wallet. It might be connected to the former wallet, or it might be funded differently, so you need to look deeper." He was right on both counts
- **THE WALLET: 0xdce001e4ec11ab58650c51ae9658accbe0f49c48.** EIP-7702 delegated wallet (code 0xef0100e6ca), nonce 7. It is a SECOND fomo-rail account, entirely separate from the public @0xuberM profile, which is why his public Open and Closed tabs show none of these coins
- THE METHOD THAT WORKED, and it is the one to reuse: stop looking for a link, and test candidates against DATED PUBLIC STATEMENTS. Steps: (1) top holders of AI (1,298), MOO (200) and ICOIN (1,250), intersected; (2) binary-search the chain for the block at his tweet time (5 Aug 02:28 UTC = block 28,126,558); (3) per-address eth_getLogs on the token, topic2 = candidate, toBlock = that block, which answers "did you own it when he said it"; (4) then test the coin he DROPPED, not just the ones he holds
- THE FIVE DATED MATCHES, every one independent:
  1. **AI first buy 14 Jul 18:07 UTC, nineteen minutes after the AI pool was created at 17:48.** He posted "Ticker AI on Robinhood chain still a spot" on 5 Aug at 70K views. Holds 2,004,252 AI today, 91 buys and 142 sells
  2. **MOO first buy 23 Jul 15:19**, holds 5,163,784. He shilled MOO on 5 Sep with "+100m on $moo will come quick" and "my first ticker shill on TL since AI"
  3. **ICOIN first buy 2 Sep 19:43**, holds 5,590,522. He named iCoin as a LONG token on 5-6 Sep, three days after buying it
  4. **SPACEHOOD bought from 14 Jul 17:26, 32 buys, FULLY EXITED, last sell 2 Sep 13:59.** He posted "a dog, a cow, a hoodie and a dream" on 1 Sep, and by 5-6 Sep the hoodie was gone from his list, prompting @DegenToDisciple to ask "No more space hood?"
  5. It holds AI, MOO and ICOIN and no SPACEHOOD, which is verbatim "My 3 LONG tokens currently are AI, Moo and iCoin"
- UNIQUENESS. Of 56 wallets holding both AI and MOO, only FIVE owned AI before his 5 Aug post: this one (37 pre-post legs), 0x9563cefc253b87773786f439589cf96b333526e8 (9), 0xfab9d34749d10c1f171aa79b8832d789a044d4d1 (5), 0x696cba91fdc752171f7bb0a8e689c13212c77e03 (5), 0xfd6e86cf9aeca787cffb198bca859d459a44a847 (4). Of those, 0x9563cefc and 0xfd6e86cf NEVER held SPACEHOOD, and 0xfab9d347 still holds 6,216,458 of it. Only 0xdce001e4 and 0x696cba91 held and exited it, and 0x696cba91 only entered AI on 21 Jul with 5 buys against this wallet's day-one entry and 91 buys. **One wallet fits all five.**
- WHAT IS NOT PROVEN: there is no on-chain link to 0xcf6cdf01acb524d8e53d1d13b1a89fcadbd7034c or 0xc3a76958cb75bd3070462515916fa6ff2564c405. His main wallet has made exactly one non-router transfer in its life and it was not to this address, so this account was funded independently, as Ben guessed. The identification is behavioural, matched against five dated public statements, not cryptographic
- THE ONE-CLICK CONFIRMATION FOR BEN: on fomo.family the AI token page, Holders tab, find the trader holding about 2.0M AI. That handle is the owner of this wallet. Bulk-scraping that list was blocked by policy, so it needs a human eye
- SECOND-BEST CANDIDATE, keep on file: 0x696cba91fdc752171f7bb0a8e689c13212c77e03, AI first buy 21 Jul 13:12 (1,052,926 held), SPACEHOOD bought 12 Aug and exited, ICOIN first buy 3 Sep 15:23 (3,072,668 held)

## Wallet-analysis tooling for Robinhood Chain, tested 6 Sep 2026

- [stated] Ben asked for the best website to paste a wallet address into and see holdings, profitability, entries and exits
- **DEBANK WORKS ON ROBINHOOD CHAIN.** debank.com/profile/{address}. Its chain list carries Robinhood as id "hood", network_id 4663, added 30 Apr 2026. Note `is_support_history: false` on the chain record, yet the site itself renders a Transactions tab. Its unofficial api.debank.com endpoints 429 almost immediately from the container, so use the website, not the API
- DeBank on 0xdce001e4ec11ab58650c51ae9658accbe0f49c48, which independently CORROBORATES the identification: **total $589,443, 100% on Robinhood Chain.** AI 2,004,252.2507 = $416,530.17 (71% of the book), MOO 5,163,783.9618 = $93,110.88, ROBINVAULT 8,274,336.1286 = $35,410.45, ICOIN 5,590,521.7694 = $22,993.55, GASOLINU 14,969,097.6863 = $10,341.65, MUPPETS 10,946,232.8573 = ~$4,300. Wallet age 247 days. A half-million-dollar book that is 71% AI is exactly the conviction his posts describe
- **GMGN DOES NOT COVER ROBINHOOD CHAIN.** gmgn.ai/hood/address/{addr} resolves and the tab title renders "30D Realized Profit $(--)" but there is no data; its own copy lists Solana, BSC, Base and Ethereum only. Do not send Ben there for this chain
- DexScreener's per-pair trader filter (the ?maker= URL parameter) is the tool for entries and exits per token, but from an automated browser it hit a Cloudflare bot check, so it needs a human session. **CAVEAT that matters on this chain: fomo trades are signed by a RELAYER, and DexScreener indexes tx.origin as the maker, so the filter can miss fomo-routed buys entirely.** For a 7702 fomo wallet, trust eth_getLogs on the token with topic2 = the address instead
- fomo.family is the only source that gives profit and average entry per token, on its token Holders tab, but it is keyed by HANDLE and not by address, so it cannot be queried with a wallet
- PRACTICAL STACK: DeBank for the book, eth_getLogs for exact buys and sells with timestamps, fomo for PnL and average entry when the handle is known

## ELON confirms the wallet, 6 Sep 2026 — an independent hit

- [stated] Ben asked whether he ever bought ELON 0x38c4d77938821037d3a42c7da0519ee5a9158cad, the coin he had said "was shilled to him"
- **HE DID, TWICE, AND THE TRADING WALLET IS WHERE IT HAPPENED.** Full-history eth_getLogs on 0xdce001e4ec11ab58650c51ae9658accbe0f49c48: IN 30 Aug 10:13 UTC 8,792,908 ELON, OUT 30 Aug 10:25 4,396,454 (twelve minutes later), OUT 30 Aug 12:02 4,396,454 (fully out in 1h49m). Then back IN 3 Sep 18:48 4,788,675 and fully OUT 4 Sep 02:24. Balance today zero
- ELON's pool was created 30 Aug 00:05:57, so his first buy was about ten hours into its life
- **THIS IS THE STRONGEST VALIDATION THE IDENTIFICATION HAS.** ELON was NOT one of the five dated posts used to find the wallet. Ben supplied it independently, as a coin he believed was pitched to uberM, and the wallet had traded it. Neither fomo wallet has ever touched ELON (zero inbound, zero outbound, both)
- Behaviour note worth carrying: on ELON he was a same-day flipper, not a holder. That is the opposite of his AI, MOO and iCoin posture, and it matches him never posting about ELON publicly. **The coins he posts about he holds; the coins pitched to him he flips inside hours.**