Vets Used in Military Drug Experiments Win Class Status

American veterans suing the military and CIA for allegedly using them as guinea pigs in chemical and biological tests from 1922 to the present won the right to pursue the case as a class action, a federal judge ruled late Sunday.

Chief District Judge Claudia Wilken granted class action status in a 59-page order posted online.  The suit alleges a vast program of secret human experimentation with such chemical weapons as mustard gas and Sarin exposed soldiers for decades.

The experiments may cover as many as 100,000 military personnel at numerous facilities over the decades, according to the plaintiffs.

The lawsuit alleges that from World War I to about 1975, “soldier volunteers” were experimentally exposed to a wide range of chemical agents for research atomic, biological and chemical warfare.  The claims include constitutional violations and violation of the Administrative Procedures Act.

Although a 1953 memorandum by the Army required voluntary consent from soldiers and that subjects be informed of potential dangers, the suit alleges “all volunteers participated without giving informed consent because the full risks of the experiments were not fully disclosed,” Wilken wrote.

The lawsuit was filed in 2009 by Vietnam Veterans of American, Swords to Plowshares and a host of individuals.  It claims the soldiers were given more than 250 drugs and as potentially as many as 400.  Along with deadly Sarin, they were allegedly exposed to amphetamines, barbiturates, mustard gas, phosgene gas, Thorazine and LSD.

The suit also includes an allegation that the far flung testing included experiments with septal electrodes implanted to test the ability to directly control human behavior.

The Department of Defense argues that it is “unaware of any general long-term health effects associated with the chemical and biological testing programs,” Wilken wrote.  But that is contradicted by the department’s own documents, she said.

She concluded that plaintiffs may pursue claims for failure to provide notice to test subjects and the right to pursue claims for medical care to test subjects.

In 2002, Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act, which required the Secretary of Defense to work to identify projects or tests conducted by the military that may have exposed armed forces to chemical or biological agents.

Test subjects were compelled to sign secrecy agreements and face military discipline if they violated the lifetime oath.  The suit seeks to life the secrecy oaths to allow soldiers to discuss the testing and receive health care.

The CIA has said it cannot locate records and denied that the secrecy oaths exist.

“The CIA’s self-serving statement that it cannot locate records of secrecy oaths that it directly administered, and thus does not believe that such oaths were made, does not establish this fact or that other secrecy oaths cannot be traced fairly to the CIA,” Wilken wrote.  She said the plaintiffs may include the CIA in their claims regarding the oaths.

To show that a death or disability is connected to a veteran’s participation in the testing, or those seeking survivor benefits, they must show that it is at least likely as not that there is a link.

In 2005, letters related to WWII-era testing went to 321 individuals or their survivors who could be located from a database of nearly 4,500 individuals exposed to mustard gas and other material.

A second round of letters went to 4,000 people from a list of 10,000 who participated in Cold War-era testing.

The decision names Morrison & Foerster as class counsel for the veterans.

Case:  Vietnam Veterans of America v. CIA, No. C09-0037CW




  1. My father is 93 years old and has always claimed that he was used as a guinea pig… Forced to take drugs for malaria… And barbiturates… And even drugs used for euthanasia. This all happened in 1944 and he has never stopped trying to uncover the truth. He was finally given his military records in 1990 which shows and proves everything. Please help him find closure for this. He wants to send all his correspondence and records to a Hollywood movie maker. Thanks!


  2. USAF 1952-1956, 100% disabeled veteran.

    Subject: Congress does its job?

    It is the responsibility of the U.S. Congress, “To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces”; U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Sect. 8, Clause 14.

    The, “IS MILITARY RESEARCH HAZARDOUS TO VETERANS’ HEALTH? LESSONS SPANNING HALF A CENTURY” REPORT was supported by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and issued by the U.S. Senate in 1994. Its then 50 years of “experiments that were designed to harm” “conducted on hundreds of thousands” of U.S. Military Personnel was ignored by the U.S. Congress and the Department of Justice (DOJ) in 1994. This rejection is DOJ and U.S. Congress duplicated during the ongoing 18 years, e.g., 2002! Then this REPORT’S: “III. Findings and conclusions”, “K. DOD and DVA have repeatedly failed to provide information and medical followup to those who participate in military research…” plus “N. Participation in military research is rarely included in military medical records, making it impossible to support a veteran’s claim for service-connected disabilities from military research.” The continued withholding of this needed for treatment but experiment identifying evidence is demonstrated by the “Veterans Right to Know Act”. It has been rejected by the U.S. Congress EIGHT (8) times from 1999 through 2007 and to-date. Also scorned is the REPORT’S, “The Feres Doctrine should not be applied for military personnel who are harmed by inappropriate human experimentation when informed consent has not been given.” Thereby, past, present and future Experimental Military Subjects never the wiser become!

    In 2012 shouldn’t U.S. Service Personnel have the same U.S. Constitutional, Amendment 8, Rights that convicted rapists and murderers keep, i.e., “…Freedom from Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.”? Source citations on request.

    Your ideas on how to accomplish what 68 years (1944 to 2012) of U.S. Congressional, “…Regulation of the land and naval Forces” has not, would be appreciated.

    Thank you for your consideration.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s