Skip to content

TrialInsider.com

Opening the Courtroom Door

  • Home
  • US Court of Appeal
  • US District Court
  • Criminal
  • Civil
  • Contact

Tag: AU Optronics

No Retrial in Jury Misconduct Claim

August 6, 2015 pammaclean

A former AU Optronics executive convicted in a price-fixing conspiracy cannot get a new trial even though some jurors may have made up their minds

Continue reading

LCD Price-Fixing Convictions Upheld

July 10, 2014 pammaclean

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a $500 million price-fixing judgment and convictions of two former Taiwanese executives of AU Optronics Corp. for

Continue reading

Exec Acquitted of LCD Price-Fixing

October 11, 2013 pammaclean

A federal jury has acquitted AU Optronics Corp.’s head of notebook sales division of price-fixing in the market for liquid crystal displays, used in tablets,

Continue reading

AU Optronics Exec Gets Two Years in Price-Fixing Scheme

April 30, 2013 pammaclean

A federal judge in San Francisco sentenced AU Optronics Corp. executive Steven Leung to two years in prison and fined him $50,000 Monday for his

Continue reading

AT&T Price-Fixing Suit Revived

February 14, 2013 pammaclean

AT&T Inc. won reinstatement of its price-fixing lawsuit against AU Optronics Corp, Samsung Electronics and a host of other makers of liquid crystal display panels.

Continue reading

Corporate Criminal Price-Fixing Trial Starts

January 10, 2012 pammaclean

One of the few companies to fight criminal charges of conspiracy fix prices is Taiwan’s AU Optronics Corp. in a trial that got under way

Continue reading

Recent Posts

  • Judge in Flynn Case Seeks Appeal Rehearing in DC Circuit
  • Alaska Oil, Gas Lease Sale Approved
  • Yellowstone Grizzly Must Remain Protected, Appeals Court Says
  • Judge Strikes Down Trump Asylum Bar Targeting Central Americans
  • Maryland ‘Bump Stock’ Ban Upheld on Appeal
Follow TrialInsider.com on WordPress.com

Archives

  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • TrialInsider.com
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • TrialInsider.com
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...