Skip to content

TrialInsider.com

Opening the Courtroom Door

  • Home
  • US Court of Appeal
  • US District Court
  • Criminal
  • Civil
  • Contact

Tag: Intel

97 Tech Companies Tell Appeals Court They Oppose Travel Ban

February 6, 2017 pammaclean

Some 97 technology companies filed arguments with a federal appeals court Sunday arguing that President Trump’s travel ban will hinder America’s ability to “attract great

Continue reading

Google, Apple Set New Deal on Anti-Poaching Suit

January 14, 2015 pammaclean

A new settlement agreement has been reached between Google Inc, Apple Inc, Intel Corp and Adobe Systems Inc and a class of software engineers who

Continue reading

Judge: $324Mln Anti-Poaching Deal Too Low

August 8, 2014 pammaclean

Happy hour started early this Friday for Silicon Valley tech workers. U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh rejected as too low a proposed $324 million settlement

Continue reading

Google, Apple Settle High-Tech Poaching Case

April 25, 2014 pammaclean

Google, Apple, Intel and Adobe Systems agreed to settle a class action lawsuit accusing them of a secret non-poaching agreement that would prevent their engineers

Continue reading

High Tech Workers May Sue Bosses in Pay Dispute

January 15, 2014 pammaclean

Nearly 60,000 Silicon Valley workers can go ahead with a class action against seven major tech firms for allegedly conspiring to suppress their pay by

Continue reading

Partial Deal in High-Tech Wage Case

July 15, 2013 pammaclean

Pixar and Lucasfilm have settled with a five software engineers  in a suit claiming Silicon Valley’s top tech firms conspired to avoid bidding wars over

Continue reading

Recent Posts

  • Judge in Flynn Case Seeks Appeal Rehearing in DC Circuit
  • Alaska Oil, Gas Lease Sale Approved
  • Yellowstone Grizzly Must Remain Protected, Appeals Court Says
  • Judge Strikes Down Trump Asylum Bar Targeting Central Americans
  • Maryland ‘Bump Stock’ Ban Upheld on Appeal
Follow TrialInsider.com on WordPress.com

Archives

  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • TrialInsider.com
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • TrialInsider.com
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...